老澳门开奖结果

This challenge arises in a unique and very important context. In July 2010, the 老澳门开奖结果 had planned to bring a lawsuit challenging the government鈥檚 startling claim that it had the power to target and kill U.S. citizens suspected of terrorist crime away from war zones. This targeted killing program is being operated in secret: the public does not know what criteria are used to decide someone should be killed, nor has the government revealed what internal safeguards exist on the program. The 老澳门开奖结果 sought to challenge the program in the only way possible under our legal system: on behalf of a citizen who is on the targeted killing list. While at least 3 Americans are on the list, the only one whose identity is known is Anwar al-Aulaqi. The 老澳门开奖结果 and co-counsel Center for Constitutional Rights were retained by Aulaqi鈥檚 father, Nasser al-Aulaqi, in order to bring the constitutional challenge to the targeted killing program.

On July 16, 2010, many months after the government had made clear its intention to kill Anwar al-Aulaqi, OFAC undertook to freeze his assets. OFAC鈥檚 rules did not just freeze Aulaqi鈥檚 assets; they made it illegal for any attorney to provide 鈥渓egal services鈥� on his behalf without first obtaining a license. In other words, the same government that is seeking to kill a U.S. citizen has taken steps that prohibit attorneys from testing the legality of the government鈥檚 decision to kill him. The 老澳门开奖结果 could not proceed with its planned legal challenge to the targeted killing program until it obtained a license from OFAC. OFAC did not respond to the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 request for a license.

Together with our partners at CCR, the 老澳门开奖结果 has filed this lawsuit in order to be able to bring the targeted killing challenge but also, more broadly, in order to challenge OFAC鈥檚 unconstitutional restrictions on the right to counsel. We believe that OFAC should not be in the business of telling individuals who can represent them, or telling the 老澳门开奖结果 whom it can represent, and OFAC certainly should not have completely unbridled discretion to make these kinds of decisions.