老澳门开奖结果

Conservatives have, for some time, argued that intentional discrimination 鈥� not disparate impact 鈥� should be the only basis for discrimination claims. But such a ruling would eviscerate most disability rights litigation. As Alexander v. Choate explained, discrimination against people with disabilities is 鈥渕ost often the product, not of invidious animus, but rather of thoughtlessness and indifference 鈥� of benign neglect.鈥�

The 老澳门开奖结果 joined others in the disability rights world to craft an amicus brief, and at the same time approach both plaintiffs and defendants to drop the case. We pursued private and public avenues, with a public campaign to shame CVS for pursuing this theory. On November 10th, less than a month away from oral argument, CVS agreed to drop the case.