Hernandez v. Mesa
What's at Stake
Whether the parents of a 15-year old Mexican boy who was fatally shot by a United States Border Patrol Agent can bring a Bivens action against the Agent for using deadly force in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments when there is no alternative remedy.
Summary
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û has a longstanding interest in enforcing constitutional and statutory constraints on the federal government’s immigration enforcement activities at the border. Here, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û represents Araceli Rodriguez in her claims against U.S. Border Patrol Agent Lonnie Swartz for the cross-border shooting of her teenage son, J.A., a Mexican national who was in Nogales, Sonora, Mexico at the time of the shooting. Our amicus brief addresses the importance of Bivens remedies as a vital check on unconstitutional acts by federal agents and argues that the extraterritorial nature of the murder does not warrant the denial of a Bivens remedy to the Rodriguez family.
Legal Documents
-
08/21/2019
Hernandez V. Mesa: ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Amicus Brief
Date Filed: 08/21/2019