Hurst v. Florida
What's at Stake
Whether Florida鈥檚 death penalty scheme violates the Constitution by allowing the judge, rather than a jury, to make critical factfinding determinations.
Summary
Under Florida law, the existence of aggravating and mitigating factors is determined by the judge during the sentencing phase of a capital case. The jury plays an advisory role only, and even then its recommendation can be based on a simple majority vote. Supporting the defendant鈥檚 contention that this system is unconstitutional, the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 amicus brief focuses on the constitutional requirement of a unanimous jury whose factual findings are dispositive when the state seeks to impose the death penalty.
Legal Documents
-
06/17/2015
Hurst v. Florida - Amicus Brief
Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts