Idaho Federation of Teachers v. Labrador
What's at Stake
This lawsuit challenged an Idaho statute that purports to criminalize the use of any public funds to 鈥減romote abortion鈥 or 鈥渃ounsel in favor of abortion.鈥 We argued that the law violates the First Amendment by restricting academic speech about abortion by faculty at Idaho鈥檚 public universities, and that the law is unconstitutionally vague.
Summary
On August 8, 2023, the 老澳门开奖结果, the 老澳门开奖结果 of Idaho, Professor Seth Kreimer, and law firm Strindberg Scholnick Birch Hallam Harstad Thorne filed a lawsuit in Idaho to challenge that state鈥檚 No Public Funds for Abortion Act (鈥淣PFAA鈥). The NPFAA criminalizes the use of any public finds to 鈥減romote abortion鈥 or 鈥渃ounsel in favor of abortion.鈥 The statute is part of a flurry of recent anti-abortion legislation in Idaho but also represents a novel attack on speech related to abortion.
The plaintiffs in this case are two teachers鈥 unions鈥攖he Idaho Federation of Teachers and the University of Idaho Teachers Federation, Local 3215 of the American Federation of Teachers鈥攁nd six university professors, who teach at the University of Idaho and Boise State University. Our Plaintiffs teach about abortion across diverse disciplines, including bioethics, philosophy, history, literature, political science, sociology, journalism, and social work. As a result of the NPFAA, they excised modules out of course curricula, removed reading assignments, avoided lectures or classroom discussions, refrained from substantive feedback on student research and writing, and ceased their own scholarship or promotion of their scholarship about abortion.
They argued that the NPFAA violates the First Amendment by restricting the academic speech of faculty at Idaho鈥檚 public universities. They also argued that the NPFAA violates the Fourteenth Amendment鈥檚 Due Process Clause, which prohibits vague laws, because the NPFAA鈥檚 plain text leaves unclear where the NPFAA draws the line between permissible speech and speech that 鈥減romotes鈥 or 鈥渃ounsels in favor of鈥 abortion.
The NPFAA is one of many attempts in Idaho to attack reproductive health care鈥攁nd information about this essential care鈥攊n the wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade. The Dobbs ruling allowed Idaho鈥檚 criminal ban on abortion to go into effect, prohibiting virtually all abortion care. In its wake, the Idaho Attorney General issued a legal opinion claiming that health care providers cannot refer patients out of state for abortion care under Idaho鈥檚 ban鈥攁 threat that was subsequently blocked by a federal court for blatantly violating the free speech rights of physicians to make appropriate medical referrals. And the state legislature in 2023 passed a law that criminalizes assisting a pregnant minor to obtain abortion care in states where abortion is still legal, and even explicitly protected.
This case is part of the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 ongoing efforts to combat emerging speech restrictions on abortion following Dobbs, including West Alabama Women鈥檚 Center v. Marshall, Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai鈥檌, Indiana, Kentucky v. Labrador, and Guam Society of OBGYNS v. Guerrero. It is also part of the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 ongoing efforts to protect academic freedom, including in Pernell v. Lamb and BERT v. O鈥機onnor.
Decision: Idaho Federation of Teachers v. Labrador
On July 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho dismissed the case because the officials charged with enforcing the law committed not to enforce it in the setting of academic speech. In particular, the court found that Idaho professors can engage in their planned teaching and scholarship under the law without fear of prosecution, resting on explicit commitments by the Idaho attorney general after this lawsuit was filed that the NPFAA does not apply to academic speech. In reaching its decision, the court agreed with the university professors that a one-sided prohibition restricting 鈥渟peech that promotes or counsels in favor abortion, while permitting speech that denounces or counsels against abortion,鈥 is 鈥渂latantly unconstitutional.鈥 Nevertheless, based on the attorney general鈥檚 commitment not to enforce the NPFAA against academic speech, the court concluded that professors lacked standing to challenge the law and dismissed the case. By recognizing the merits of plaintiffs鈥 claims and hinging its dismissal on the attorney general鈥檚 explicit promise not to use the NPFAA to punish protected academic speech, the outcome in this case allows our plaintiffs to commence teaching and pursuing scholarship about abortion as they would have prior to passage of the NPFAA.
Legal Documents
-
08/08/2023
Complaint -
08/08/2023
Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
-
08/08/2023
Memorandum of Law in Support of Pl's Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Scarlet Kim -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 1 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 2 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 3 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 4 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 5 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 6 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 7 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 8 -
08/08/2023
Exhibit 9 -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Martin Orr -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Luigi Boschetti -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Aleta Quinn -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Casey Johnson -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Markie McBrayer -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Zachary Turpin -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Kathryn Blevins -
08/08/2023
Declaration of Heather Witt
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsMemorandum of Law in Support of Pl's Motion for Preliminary InjunctionDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Scarlet KimDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 1Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 2Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 3Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 4Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 5Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 6Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 7Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 8Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsExhibit 9Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Martin OrrDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Luigi BoschettiDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Aleta QuinnDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Casey JohnsonDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Markie McBrayerDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Zachary TurpinDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Kathryn BlevinsDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Idaho Federation of Teachers v. LabradorLegal DocumentsDeclaration of Heather WittDate Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
-
08/08/2023
-
07/02/2024
Memorandum Decision & Order
Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Date Filed: 07/02/2024
Court: District Court (D. Idaho)
Affiliate: Idaho
Press Releases
Federal Court Rules Idaho Officials Will Not Enforce Abortion Censorship Law Against Public University Professors
Idaho Educators File Lawsuit Challenging State Law Censoring Professors鈥 Speech on Abortion