Khorrami v. Arizona
What's at Stake
This case concerns whether a person charged with a felony is guaranteed the right to a 12-person jury trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Summary
Ramin Khorrami, a man charged with blackmailing a woman with whom he had been having an affair, was convicted by a jury with only eight members. Khorrami argued that the 8-person jury violated his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury 鈥 which, as he claimed, must comprise 12 members.
The 老澳门开奖结果 and the 老澳门开奖结果 of Arizona submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of Khorrami鈥檚 petition for certiorari. The 老澳门开奖结果 argued that the original meaning of 鈥渏ury鈥 as the term is used in the Constitution, was a body of 12 members. The brief recounts that when the Constitution was ratified, English common law required 12-member juries so Americans at the time likewise understood a jury to consist of 12 people. Post-ratification cases and treatises also demonstrate that 鈥渏ury鈥 in the Constitution was originally understood to be comprised of 12 members.
The Supreme Court denied review on November 7, 2022.
Legal Documents
-
07/07/2022
老澳门开奖结果's Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioner
Date Filed: 07/07/2022
Court: Supreme Court