State Ex Rel. Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.
What's at Stake
Hours after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24th, 2022, ending the federal constitutional right to abortion and reversing nearly 50 years of precedent, a federal judge in Ohio granted the state鈥檚 request to allow the previously blocked six-week abortion ban, Senate Bill 23, to take effect. On June 29th, 2022, abortion providers in Ohio filed a lawsuit seeking to block this six-week ban with the state supreme court.
Summary
The 老澳门开奖结果, the 老澳门开奖结果 of Ohio, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the law firm WilmerHale filed a lawsuit on June 29th, 2022 in the Ohio Supreme Court seeking to block the state鈥檚 ban on abortion starting as early as six-week into pregnancy and to restore and further protect Ohioans鈥 reproductive rights secured by the Ohio Constitution. Plaintiffs asked the Ohio Supreme Court to order state officials not to enforce S.B. 23 and to declare the ban unconstitutional under the Ohio Constitution. On July 1, 2022, the Ohio Supreme Court issued an order denying our Motion for Emergency Stay. Plaintiffs waited over two months for Supreme Court action, but the harms became untenable so on September 2, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an application for dismissal in the Supreme Court, and filed a new action in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (see here). On September 12, 2022, the Supreme Court granted the application for dismissal and closed the case. Since that time, the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas has issued a preliminary injunction, blocking enforcement of the abortion ban while the case is proceeds on the merits. Following Ohioans鈥 overwhelming vote in favor of adding an explicit right to reproductive freedom to the Ohio Constitution in November of 2023, Plaintiffs have amended their complaint to add a claim under the new Article I, Section 22, Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and Safety, and have filed a dispositive motion asking the Court to permanently enjoin the abortion ban and declare it to be unconstitutional, in violation of Article I, Section 22.
If permitted to take effect once again, this abortion ban 鈥 Senate Bill 23 鈥 would radically restrict access to abortion in Ohio by lowering the gestational age limit from 22 weeks to approximately six weeks, with very limited exceptions. A violation of this law by a provider is a fifth-degree felony. As the federal district court found when it blocked Senate Bill 23 from taking effect in 2019, the ban poses an 鈥渋nsurmountable鈥 obstacle to abortion access, restricting care to such an early stage of pregnancy that most patients do not even know they are pregnant. If enforced, the ban would once again inflict serious and irreparable harm on Ohioans who are in need of and constitutionally entitled to vital reproductive health care.
The reproductive rights organizations and WilmerHale filed the lawsuit on behalf of Preterm-Cleveland, Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio, Planned Parenthood Greater Ohio, Women鈥檚 Med Group Professional Corporation, Northeast Ohio Women鈥檚 Center, Toledo Women鈥檚 Center, and Dr. Sharon Liner, an individual abortion provider.
The reproductive rights organizations and WilmerHale filed the lawsuit on behalf of Preterm-Cleveland, Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio, Planned Parenthood Greater Ohio, Women鈥檚 Med Group Professional Corporation, Northeast Ohio Women鈥檚 Center, Toledo Women鈥檚 Center, and Dr. Sharon Liner, an individual abortion provider.
Legal Documents
-
08/02/2022
STATE EX REL. PRETERM-CLEVELAND, ET AL. V. DAVE YOST, ET AL. - Relator's Motion in Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss
Date Filed: 08/02/2022
-
07/21/2022
STATE EX REL. PRETERM-CLEVELAND, ET AL. V. DAVE YOST, ET AL. - Respondent's Motion to Dismiss
Date Filed: 07/21/2022
-
07/02/2022
STATE EX REL. PRETERM-CLEVELAND, ET AL. V. DAVE YOST, ET AL. - Order Denying Stay
Date Filed: 07/02/2022
-
06/29/2022
STATE EX REL. PRETERM-CLEVELAND, ET AL. V. DAVE YOST, ET AL. - MEMORANDUM FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Date Filed: 06/29/2022
-
06/29/2022
STATE EX REL. PRETERM-CLEVELAND, ET AL. V. DAVE YOST, ET AL. - MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY
Date Filed: 06/29/2022
-
06/29/2022
STATE EX REL. PRETERM-CLEVELAND, ET AL. V. DAVE YOST, ET AL. - COMPLAINT -
09/12/2022
Defendants' Notice of Dismissal of Mandamus in Ohio Supreme Court -
09/14/2022
Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order -
09/07/2022
Order Extending Temporary Restraining Order -
10/02/2022
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction -
10/05/2022
Plaintiffs' Supplemental Motion In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
10/12/2022
Order for Preliminary Injunction -
12/14/2023
Plaintiffs' Amended Verified Complaint -
02/02/2024
Defendants' Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint -
03/01/2024
Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgement on Pleadings
Date Filed: 06/29/2022
Date Filed: 09/12/2022
Date Filed: 09/14/2022
Date Filed: 09/07/2022
Date Filed: 10/02/2022
Date Filed: 10/05/2022
Date Filed: 10/12/2022
Date Filed: 12/14/2023
Date Filed: 02/02/2024
Date Filed: 03/01/2024
Press Releases
Ohio Providers File Lawsuit in Ohio Supreme Court to Protect Ohioans鈥 Right to Abortion