Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC
What's at Stake
Whether the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û can be barred from broadcasting advertisements prior to an election that name a federal candidate, even though the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û has never taken a position on an election in its 85-year history. DECIDED
Summary
The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, better known as the McCain-Feingold Act, generally bars corporations and unions from broadcasting advertisements on radio or television in the period preceding an election if those ads refer to a candidate for federal office, including an incumbent officeholder. The Supreme Court upheld that general ban two years ago in McConnell v. FEC. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û is a nonpartisan organization that does not endorse or oppose candidates. The ban on broadcast ads nevertheless restricts the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's ability to advocate in support of civil liberties during a period of time when many civil liberties issues are being prominently debated. The question presented in this case is whether the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û (and similar organizations) should be given an opportunity to show that their speech does not raise any of the concerns that the law was enacted to prevent.
Legal Documents
-
11/21/2005
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Amicus Brief in Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC
Date Filed: 11/21/2005