Women's Rights
All Cases
131 Women's Rights Cases
Court Case
Apr 2017
Women's Rights
Nikita Smith v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc. et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women’s Rights Project, ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Washington, Northwest Justice Project, and Virginia Poverty Law Center filed a federal lawsuit in March 2017 challenging the widespread practice of denying housing applications whenever an applicant was previously named in an eviction case.
Explore case
Court Case
Apr 2017
Women's Rights
Nikita Smith v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc. et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women’s Rights Project, ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Washington, Northwest Justice Project, and Virginia Poverty Law Center filed a federal lawsuit in March 2017 challenging the widespread practice of denying housing applications whenever an applicant was previously named in an eviction case.
Missouri
Apr 2017
Women's Rights
Rosetta Watson v. Maplewood
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women’s Rights Project and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a domestic violence survivor, challenging the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance which authorizes officials to revoke a resident’s occupancy permit based on calls for police assistance with domestic violence or based on crimes occurring at the property.
Explore case
Missouri
Apr 2017
Women's Rights
Rosetta Watson v. Maplewood
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women’s Rights Project and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a domestic violence survivor, challenging the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance which authorizes officials to revoke a resident’s occupancy permit based on calls for police assistance with domestic violence or based on crimes occurring at the property.
Court Case
Jun 2016
Women's Rights
+3 Issues
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Northern California v. Burwell
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Northern California, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Southern California filed a lawsuit against the federal government for awarding millions of dollars annually to organizations that provide care, including access to medical care, to unaccompanied immigrant minors. The government authorizes some of these organizations to refuse on religious grounds to follow the law that requires them to provide these young people with access to contraception and abortion, even if the minor has been raped.
Explore case
Court Case
Jun 2016
Women's Rights
+3 Issues
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Northern California v. Burwell
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Northern California, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Southern California filed a lawsuit against the federal government for awarding millions of dollars annually to organizations that provide care, including access to medical care, to unaccompanied immigrant minors. The government authorizes some of these organizations to refuse on religious grounds to follow the law that requires them to provide these young people with access to contraception and abortion, even if the minor has been raped.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2016
Women's Rights
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
Reviewing whether a woman whose three children were killed after being abducted by her estranged husband can raise a procedural due process claim based on the Town of Castle Rock's failure to enforce a protective order despite Colorado's mandatory arrest law. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2016
Women's Rights
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
Reviewing whether a woman whose three children were killed after being abducted by her estranged husband can raise a procedural due process claim based on the Town of Castle Rock's failure to enforce a protective order despite Colorado's mandatory arrest law. DECIDED
Court Case
Jan 2016
Women's Rights
+2 Issues
Manning v. Hagel, et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of the Nation's Capital, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Kansas and civilian defense counsel David E. Coombs have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Chelsea Manning in federal court in the District of Columbia against Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and other Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of the Army officials for their failure to provide necessary medical treatment for her gender dysphoria, a condition with which she was originally diagnosed by Army doctors more than four years ago.
Explore case
Court Case
Jan 2016
Women's Rights
+2 Issues
Manning v. Hagel, et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of the Nation's Capital, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Kansas and civilian defense counsel David E. Coombs have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Chelsea Manning in federal court in the District of Columbia against Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and other Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of the Army officials for their failure to provide necessary medical treatment for her gender dysphoria, a condition with which she was originally diagnosed by Army doctors more than four years ago.