Missouri
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Free Speech
Molina v. Book
Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
All Cases
20 Missouri Cases
Missouri
Apr 2017
Women's Rights
Rosetta Watson v. Maplewood
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women’s Rights Project and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a domestic violence survivor, challenging the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance which authorizes officials to revoke a resident’s occupancy permit based on calls for police assistance with domestic violence or based on crimes occurring at the property.
Explore case
Missouri
Apr 2017
Women's Rights
Rosetta Watson v. Maplewood
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women’s Rights Project and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a domestic violence survivor, challenging the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance which authorizes officials to revoke a resident’s occupancy permit based on calls for police assistance with domestic violence or based on crimes occurring at the property.
Missouri
Mar 2017
Criminal Law Reform
Shondel Church, et al. v. State of Missouri, et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri, along with the MacArthur Justice Center, and the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, filed a class action lawsuit against the State of Missouri over its public defender office’s inability to provide adequate defense to poor people accused of crimes across the state, as required under the U.S. and Missouri Constitutions.
Explore case
Missouri
Mar 2017
Criminal Law Reform
Shondel Church, et al. v. State of Missouri, et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri, along with the MacArthur Justice Center, and the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, filed a class action lawsuit against the State of Missouri over its public defender office’s inability to provide adequate defense to poor people accused of crimes across the state, as required under the U.S. and Missouri Constitutions.
Missouri
Oct 2014
LGBTQ Rights
Barrier and Schild v. Vasterling - Freedom to Marry in Missouri
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri have filed a lawsuit in state court on behalf of six same-sex couples who are seeking recognition for their legal out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit does not seek a repeal of Missouri's ban on marriage for same-sex couples within the state.
Explore case
Missouri
Oct 2014
LGBTQ Rights
Barrier and Schild v. Vasterling - Freedom to Marry in Missouri
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Missouri have filed a lawsuit in state court on behalf of six same-sex couples who are seeking recognition for their legal out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit does not seek a repeal of Missouri's ban on marriage for same-sex couples within the state.
Missouri
Jun 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri Execution That Will Cause Irreparable Harm
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a request for precautionary measures with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the execution of John Winfield, scheduled for June 18, 2014 in the state of Missouri, will cause irreparable harm should it go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stayed until the IACHR can review and rule on the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's petition that alleges Mr. Winfield's death sentence violates international law. On June 6, 2014, the IACHR granted ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û request for precautionary measures against the United States and requested that "the Government of the United States to abstain from executing John Winfield until the IACHR has ruled on the merits of the individual petition filed on his behalf."
Explore case
Missouri
Jun 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri Execution That Will Cause Irreparable Harm
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a request for precautionary measures with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the execution of John Winfield, scheduled for June 18, 2014 in the state of Missouri, will cause irreparable harm should it go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stayed until the IACHR can review and rule on the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's petition that alleges Mr. Winfield's death sentence violates international law. On June 6, 2014, the IACHR granted ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û request for precautionary measures against the United States and requested that "the Government of the United States to abstain from executing John Winfield until the IACHR has ruled on the merits of the individual petition filed on his behalf."
Missouri
May 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri and Oklahoma Executions that Will Violate International Law
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a petition with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the upcoming executions by lethal injection in Missouri and Oklahoma will violate international law against cruel and unusual punishment, should they go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stopped until the IACHR can conduct independent investigations of the two cases.
Explore case
Missouri
May 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri and Oklahoma Executions that Will Violate International Law
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a petition with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the upcoming executions by lethal injection in Missouri and Oklahoma will violate international law against cruel and unusual punishment, should they go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stopped until the IACHR can conduct independent investigations of the two cases.