Mass Incarceration
Dockery v. Hall
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated "in a perpetual state of crisis" where prisoners are at "grave risk of death and loss of limbs." The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
View Case
Learn ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Mass Incarceration
All Cases
158 Mass Incarceration Cases
Court Case
May 2014
Mass Incarceration
+2 Issues
Hill v. United States of America
In March 2014, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û urged the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to rule that sentencing children to mandatory life without the possibility of parole violates the Declaration of the Rights of Man and universal human rights principles. This hearing was held in response to a February 2006 petition from the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and several other organizations to the IACHR, alleging that the human rights of juveniles sentenced to life without parole were being violated.
Explore case
Court Case
May 2014
Mass Incarceration
+2 Issues
Hill v. United States of America
In March 2014, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û urged the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to rule that sentencing children to mandatory life without the possibility of parole violates the Declaration of the Rights of Man and universal human rights principles. This hearing was held in response to a February 2006 petition from the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and several other organizations to the IACHR, alleging that the human rights of juveniles sentenced to life without parole were being violated.
Court Case
Mar 2014
Mass Incarceration
Racial Justice
Sheff v. O'Neill
A groundbreaking school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut.
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2014
Mass Incarceration
Racial Justice
Sheff v. O'Neill
A groundbreaking school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut.
South Dakota
Feb 2014
Mass Incarceration
Racial Justice
Antoine v. Winner School District
Filed in 2006, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's Antoine v. Winner School District class action lawsuit alleged discrimination against Native American students in the mostly-white Winner, South Dakota school district. The lawsuit was settled in December of 2007, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û works directly with the community and the defendant school district to implement the resulting Consent Decree.
Explore case
South Dakota
Feb 2014
Mass Incarceration
Racial Justice
Antoine v. Winner School District
Filed in 2006, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's Antoine v. Winner School District class action lawsuit alleged discrimination against Native American students in the mostly-white Winner, South Dakota school district. The lawsuit was settled in December of 2007, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û works directly with the community and the defendant school district to implement the resulting Consent Decree.
Court Case
Oct 2013
Mass Incarceration
Smart Justice
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of New Jersey v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of New Jersey sued the FBI and Department of Justice in 2011 for records related to the FBI's use of race and ethnicity in conducting assessments and investigations of local communities in New Jersey.
Explore case
Court Case
Oct 2013
Mass Incarceration
Smart Justice
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of New Jersey v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of New Jersey sued the FBI and Department of Justice in 2011 for records related to the FBI's use of race and ethnicity in conducting assessments and investigations of local communities in New Jersey.
Alabama
Sep 2013
Mass Incarceration
+3 Issues
Henderson et al. v. Thomas et al.
A federal judge has ruled that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) can no longer discriminate against prisoners living with HIV by housing them separately from all other prisoners and categorically denying them equal access to prison rehabilitative programs, according to a landmark decision in a lawsuit filed by the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û National Prison Project, the AIDS Project, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Alabama. This ruling paves the way for prisoners living with HIV to have access to needed and appropriate services, and to the classes and training available to other prisoners.
Explore case
Alabama
Sep 2013
Mass Incarceration
+3 Issues
Henderson et al. v. Thomas et al.
A federal judge has ruled that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) can no longer discriminate against prisoners living with HIV by housing them separately from all other prisoners and categorically denying them equal access to prison rehabilitative programs, according to a landmark decision in a lawsuit filed by the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û National Prison Project, the AIDS Project, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Alabama. This ruling paves the way for prisoners living with HIV to have access to needed and appropriate services, and to the classes and training available to other prisoners.