Capital Punishment
Manuel Velez v. The State of Texas
Manuel Velez, an innocent man, was released from a Texas prison today after almost nine years behind bars, four on death row. Rather than risk a new trial that could be plagued with the same problems that sent him to death row, Velez, an ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û client, pleaded no contest to a lesser charge.
View Case
Learn ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Capital Punishment
All Cases
58 Capital Punishment Cases
Missouri
Jun 2014
Capital Punishment
Smart Justice
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri Execution That Will Cause Irreparable Harm
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a request for precautionary measures with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the execution of John Winfield, scheduled for June 18, 2014 in the state of Missouri, will cause irreparable harm should it go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stayed until the IACHR can review and rule on the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's petition that alleges Mr. Winfield's death sentence violates international law. On June 6, 2014, the IACHR granted ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û request for precautionary measures against the United States and requested that "the Government of the United States to abstain from executing John Winfield until the IACHR has ruled on the merits of the individual petition filed on his behalf."
Explore case
Missouri
Jun 2014
Capital Punishment
Smart Justice
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri Execution That Will Cause Irreparable Harm
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a request for precautionary measures with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the execution of John Winfield, scheduled for June 18, 2014 in the state of Missouri, will cause irreparable harm should it go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stayed until the IACHR can review and rule on the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's petition that alleges Mr. Winfield's death sentence violates international law. On June 6, 2014, the IACHR granted ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û request for precautionary measures against the United States and requested that "the Government of the United States to abstain from executing John Winfield until the IACHR has ruled on the merits of the individual petition filed on his behalf."
Missouri
May 2014
Capital Punishment
Smart Justice
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri and Oklahoma Executions that Will Violate International Law
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a petition with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the upcoming executions by lethal injection in Missouri and Oklahoma will violate international law against cruel and unusual punishment, should they go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stopped until the IACHR can conduct independent investigations of the two cases.
Explore case
Missouri
May 2014
Capital Punishment
Smart Justice
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri and Oklahoma Executions that Will Violate International Law
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a petition with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the upcoming executions by lethal injection in Missouri and Oklahoma will violate international law against cruel and unusual punishment, should they go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stopped until the IACHR can conduct independent investigations of the two cases.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2013
Capital Punishment
+2 Issues
Kansas v. Cheever
Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state's ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state's expert.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2013
Capital Punishment
+2 Issues
Kansas v. Cheever
Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state's ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state's expert.
Court Case
Dec 2012
Capital Punishment
Smart Justice
Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act
On August 3, 2010, five North Carolina death row inmates filed claims under their state's landmark legislation, the Racial Justice Act. The law, which passed in August 2009, requires that courts enter a life sentence for any death row defendant who proves that race was a factor in the imposition of his or her death sentence.
Explore case
Court Case
Dec 2012
Capital Punishment
Smart Justice
Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act
On August 3, 2010, five North Carolina death row inmates filed claims under their state's landmark legislation, the Racial Justice Act. The law, which passed in August 2009, requires that courts enter a life sentence for any death row defendant who proves that race was a factor in the imposition of his or her death sentence.