Smart Justice
Singleton v. Cannizzaro
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Trone Center for Justice and Equality, ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Louisiana, and Civil Rights Corps, filed suit against District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro, his office in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, and several Assistant District Attorneys for systematically breaking the laws of Louisiana and of the U.S. Constitution.
View Case
Learn ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Smart Justice
Featured
Mississippi
Mar 2017
Smart Justice
Prisoners' Rights
Dockery v. Hall
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated "in a perpetual state of crisis" where prisoners are at "grave risk of death and loss of limbs." The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
All Cases
187 Smart Justice Cases
Missouri
Jun 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri Execution That Will Cause Irreparable Harm
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a request for precautionary measures with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the execution of John Winfield, scheduled for June 18, 2014 in the state of Missouri, will cause irreparable harm should it go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stayed until the IACHR can review and rule on the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's petition that alleges Mr. Winfield's death sentence violates international law. On June 6, 2014, the IACHR granted ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û request for precautionary measures against the United States and requested that "the Government of the United States to abstain from executing John Winfield until the IACHR has ruled on the merits of the individual petition filed on his behalf."
Explore case
Missouri
Jun 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri Execution That Will Cause Irreparable Harm
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a request for precautionary measures with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the execution of John Winfield, scheduled for June 18, 2014 in the state of Missouri, will cause irreparable harm should it go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stayed until the IACHR can review and rule on the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's petition that alleges Mr. Winfield's death sentence violates international law. On June 6, 2014, the IACHR granted ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û request for precautionary measures against the United States and requested that "the Government of the United States to abstain from executing John Winfield until the IACHR has ruled on the merits of the individual petition filed on his behalf."
Missouri
May 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri and Oklahoma Executions that Will Violate International Law
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a petition with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the upcoming executions by lethal injection in Missouri and Oklahoma will violate international law against cruel and unusual punishment, should they go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stopped until the IACHR can conduct independent investigations of the two cases.
Explore case
Missouri
May 2014
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Petition to IACHR on Missouri and Oklahoma Executions that Will Violate International Law
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a petition with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Human Rights showing that the upcoming executions by lethal injection in Missouri and Oklahoma will violate international law against cruel and unusual punishment, should they go forward. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û asks that the executions be stopped until the IACHR can conduct independent investigations of the two cases.
Court Case
May 2014
Smart Justice
+2 Issues
Hill v. United States of America
In March 2014, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û urged the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to rule that sentencing children to mandatory life without the possibility of parole violates the Declaration of the Rights of Man and universal human rights principles. This hearing was held in response to a February 2006 petition from the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and several other organizations to the IACHR, alleging that the human rights of juveniles sentenced to life without parole were being violated.
Explore case
Court Case
May 2014
Smart Justice
+2 Issues
Hill v. United States of America
In March 2014, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û urged the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to rule that sentencing children to mandatory life without the possibility of parole violates the Declaration of the Rights of Man and universal human rights principles. This hearing was held in response to a February 2006 petition from the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û and several other organizations to the IACHR, alleging that the human rights of juveniles sentenced to life without parole were being violated.
Court Case
Mar 2014
Smart Justice
Racial Justice
Sheff v. O'Neill
A groundbreaking school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut.
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2014
Smart Justice
Racial Justice
Sheff v. O'Neill
A groundbreaking school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut.
South Dakota
Feb 2014
Smart Justice
Racial Justice
Antoine v. Winner School District
Filed in 2006, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's Antoine v. Winner School District class action lawsuit alleged discrimination against Native American students in the mostly-white Winner, South Dakota school district. The lawsuit was settled in December of 2007, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û works directly with the community and the defendant school district to implement the resulting Consent Decree.
Explore case
South Dakota
Feb 2014
Smart Justice
Racial Justice
Antoine v. Winner School District
Filed in 2006, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's Antoine v. Winner School District class action lawsuit alleged discrimination against Native American students in the mostly-white Winner, South Dakota school district. The lawsuit was settled in December of 2007, and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û works directly with the community and the defendant school district to implement the resulting Consent Decree.