Abuse of Immigration Detention
Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf
The 老澳门开奖结果, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 老澳门开奖结果 Abuse of Immigration Detention
All Cases
2 Abuse of Immigration Detention Cases
Court Case
Jul 2015
Abuse of Immigration Detention
RILR v. Johnson
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered a preliminary injunction that puts an immediate halt to the government's policy of locking up mothers and children from Central America 鈥� all of whom have been found to have legitimate asylum claims 鈥� in order to send a message to other migrants that they should not come to the U.S.
Explore case
Court Case
Jul 2015
Abuse of Immigration Detention
RILR v. Johnson
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered a preliminary injunction that puts an immediate halt to the government's policy of locking up mothers and children from Central America 鈥� all of whom have been found to have legitimate asylum claims 鈥� in order to send a message to other migrants that they should not come to the U.S.
Court Case
Jan 2015
Abuse of Immigration Detention
Rivera v. Holder
Rivera v. Holder is a class action lawsuit filed in Washington State challenging the immigration courts鈥� policy of refusing to release immigrants from detention unless they post a minimum $1,500 bond. The result of this policy is that indigent and low-income immigrants stay locked-up鈥攁t taxpayer expense鈥攅ven when they pose no danger to anyone, and can be effectively supervised in the community.
Explore case
Court Case
Jan 2015
Abuse of Immigration Detention
Rivera v. Holder
Rivera v. Holder is a class action lawsuit filed in Washington State challenging the immigration courts鈥� policy of refusing to release immigrants from detention unless they post a minimum $1,500 bond. The result of this policy is that indigent and low-income immigrants stay locked-up鈥攁t taxpayer expense鈥攅ven when they pose no danger to anyone, and can be effectively supervised in the community.