Women and Criminal Justice
Gonzalez v. Ramirez et al.
Although Texas law clearly prohibits prosecuting people for terminating their pregnancies, Starr County officials indicted, arrested, and jailed Lizelle Gonzalez for having an abortion. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û’s Abortion Criminal Defense Initiative and Criminal Law Reform Project, alongside the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Texas and south Texas firm Garza Martinez, are representing Ms. Gonzalez in a lawsuit against Starr County and local officials based on violations of Ms. Gonzalez’s constitutional rights.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women and Criminal Justice
All Cases
9 Women and Criminal Justice Cases
Court Case
Jun 2020
Women and Criminal Justice
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Eric Rogers
On June 9, 2020, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women's Rights Project and ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Pennsylvania, along with 25 additional nonprofit organizations, joined an amicus brief led by the Women's Law Project and AEquitas in support of exclusion of a complainant’s criminal record for prostitution-related offenses as evidence in a sexual assault case. The amicus brief argues that a complainant’s sexual history with others is irrelevant to proving consent and that permitting evidence of a complainant’s prior prostitution arrests and convictions would reinforce gender and racial biases.
Explore case
Court Case
Jun 2020
Women and Criminal Justice
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Eric Rogers
On June 9, 2020, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Women's Rights Project and ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Pennsylvania, along with 25 additional nonprofit organizations, joined an amicus brief led by the Women's Law Project and AEquitas in support of exclusion of a complainant’s criminal record for prostitution-related offenses as evidence in a sexual assault case. The amicus brief argues that a complainant’s sexual history with others is irrelevant to proving consent and that permitting evidence of a complainant’s prior prostitution arrests and convictions would reinforce gender and racial biases.
Court Case
Jan 2016
Women and Criminal Justice
+2 Issues
Manning v. Hagel, et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of the Nation's Capital, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Kansas and civilian defense counsel David E. Coombs have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Chelsea Manning in federal court in the District of Columbia against Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and other Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of the Army officials for their failure to provide necessary medical treatment for her gender dysphoria, a condition with which she was originally diagnosed by Army doctors more than four years ago.
Explore case
Court Case
Jan 2016
Women and Criminal Justice
+2 Issues
Manning v. Hagel, et al.
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of the Nation's Capital, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Kansas and civilian defense counsel David E. Coombs have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Chelsea Manning in federal court in the District of Columbia against Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and other Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of the Army officials for their failure to provide necessary medical treatment for her gender dysphoria, a condition with which she was originally diagnosed by Army doctors more than four years ago.
Michigan
Apr 2012
Women and Criminal Justice
Women's Rights
Body Cavity Searches at Michigan’s Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility
Explore case
Michigan
Apr 2012
Women and Criminal Justice
Women's Rights
Body Cavity Searches at Michigan’s Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility
Court Case
Nov 2010
Women and Criminal Justice
Women's Rights
Sharps v. Housing Authority of the City of Annapolis
On August 12, 2009 the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a lawsuit against the Housing Authority of the City of Annapolis (HACA), challenging a policy that bans certain individuals from being on or near public housing property, even to visit their families.
Explore case
Court Case
Nov 2010
Women and Criminal Justice
Women's Rights
Sharps v. Housing Authority of the City of Annapolis
On August 12, 2009 the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a lawsuit against the Housing Authority of the City of Annapolis (HACA), challenging a policy that bans certain individuals from being on or near public housing property, even to visit their families.