ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û

This petition to the Supreme Court of Maryland asked the court to reconsider its adherence to Whren v. U.S., 517 U.S. 806 (1996), which declared that a traffic stop undertaken for pretextual reasons does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution so long as the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation occurred. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, alongside the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Maryland, filed an amicus brief in support of the defendant’s petition, in which the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û argued that the court should take up the question of whether pretextual stops violate the Maryland Constitution. In September 2024, the Court denied the petition.

This case concerns whether prosecutors can admit evidence that a person exercised their right to decide whether to terminate their pregnancy as proof of intent for murder. Here, the prosecution’s use of this evidence at Moira Akers’ trial denied her due process, resulting in an unjust conviction and a 30-year prison term. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û’s Abortion Criminal Defense Initiative, alongside the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Maryland, filed an amicus brief arguing that allowing admission of this evidence not only violated Ms. Akers’ rights but chills the right of all Marylanders to freely decide whether to continue or end their pregnancies. Ms. Akers’ case was granted certiorari and is now before the Maryland Supreme Court.

The settlement agreement was approved by the court on June 28, 2016.

The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Maryland, and Covington & Burling LLP filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on behalf of six members of the armed forces who are transgender and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Maryland. The lawsuit challenges the president’s directive banning transgender service members from continuing to serve in the military, banning transgender service members from receiving certain medically necessary health care, and banning transgender individuals from enlisting in the armed forces.