Back to News & Commentary

Texas Plans to Execute Jewish Man Denied a Fair Trial by an Anti-Semitic Judge

Image of the supreme court building in Washington, DC
Image of the supreme court building in Washington, DC
Heather L. Weaver,
Senior Staff Attorney,
老澳门开奖结果 Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief
Share This Page
October 4, 2019

UPDATE: On Friday, October 4, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, where Randy Halprin had sought relief before turning to the U.S. Supreme Court, granted a stay of execution. We commend this decision.

鈥淎 goddamn Kike.鈥

鈥淭hat fuckin鈥 Jew.鈥

According to pleadings filed yesterday with the U.S. Supreme Court, that鈥檚 how Judge Vickers Cunningham referred to Randy Halprin, a Jewish defendant whose trial he presided over. The pleadings ask the court to 鈥攃urrently scheduled for Thursday, October 10 in Texas鈥攁nd to denying him the right to seek a new trial.

Halprin鈥檚 plea to the Supreme Court is based on substantial new evidence demonstrating that Cunningham, who is no longer a judge, is a virulent racist and anti-Semite who brought his views to bear on Halprin鈥檚 case. Based on the evidence gathered by Halprin and his attorneys, it appears that Cunningham hates anyone who is not white and Protestant. For example, an affidavit filed by Tammy McKinney, who grew up with Cunningham and, as an adult, attended the same church and clubs as him, stated that Cunningham regularly used slurs 鈥渟uch as 鈥榥igger,鈥 鈥榳etback,鈥 鈥榮pic,鈥 鈥榢ike,鈥 [and] 鈥榯he fuckin鈥 Jews.鈥欌

Amanda Tackett, who worked for his campaign to become the Dallas district attorney, similarly attested that Cunningham 鈥渟aid he wanted to run for office so that he could save Dallas from 鈥榥iggers,鈥 鈥榳etbacks,鈥 Jews, and dirty Catholics.鈥 In addition, she recounted a discussion about a Jewish attorney鈥檚 investigation into wrongful convictions during which Cunningham complained that the 鈥溾榝ilthy Jew鈥 . . . was going to come in and free all these 鈥榥iggers.鈥欌

Cunningham has also repeatedly espoused anti-Jewish stereotypes, according to those who know him. In one instance detailed by Tackett, he warned that Jewish people need 鈥渢o be shut down鈥 because they control 鈥渁ll the money and all the power.鈥 He reportedly wore a stereotypical banker鈥檚 outfit (a green visor and suspenders) at a casino-themed party and declared that he was a 鈥淛ew banker.鈥 Even Cunningham鈥檚 mother that her son鈥檚 鈥渂iggest burden was his bigotry.鈥

Despite his numerous derogatory comments to friends, family, and acquaintances, Cunningham managed to conceal the extent of his prejudice from the public for years鈥攗ntil a pulled back the curtain on him. No longer a judge, Cunningham was running for county commissioner when his brother revealed to the newspaper that he was a 鈥渓ifelong racist.鈥 The article also reported that Cunningham 鈥渄escribed criminal cases involving black people as 鈥楾.N.D.s,鈥 short for 鈥楾ypical [N-word] Deals.鈥欌 And, the article exposed the existence of a trust he had set up in 2010 for his children, with a stipulation that provides a monetary distribution upon marriage but only if the child marries a white, Christian person of the opposite sex.

Although Cunningham acknowledged that he had established the discriminatory trust, he told the newspaper that his views 鈥渘ever translated into unfairness on the bench or discrimination in any way.鈥 But as we all know, that鈥檚 not how prejudice works. This sort of lifelong, deep-seated bigotry simply can鈥檛 be switched off just because an individual puts on a judge鈥檚 robe and takes the bench.

The Dallas News piece immediately garnered the attention of Halprin鈥檚 attorneys. As the presiding judge at his 2003 trial, Cunningham knew that Halprin was Jewish: His faith came up several times during the proceedings. On investigating further, the attorneys discovered that not only was Cunningham prejudiced against Jewish people generally, but he used anti-Semitic slurs when talking about Halprin. Moreover, according to McKinney, he 鈥渢ook special pride in the death sentences鈥 of Halprin and his co-defendants (known as the 鈥淭exas Seven鈥) because 鈥渢hey included Latinos and a Jew,鈥 boasting, 鈥淔rom the wetback to the Jew, they knew they were going to die.鈥

Like all criminal defendants, Randy Halprin was entitled to a fair trial with an unbiased, neutral arbiter. Instead, key rulings that helped determine his fate鈥攊ncluding the decision to prohibit him from presenting evidence to the jury mitigating his guilt鈥攚ere made by a judge who denigrated him as a 鈥済oddamn kike鈥 and 鈥渁 fucking Jew鈥 and who took pride in sentencing 鈥渢he Jew鈥 to death. That鈥檚 not due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Nor is it religious neutrality under the First Amendment. And it鈥檚 certainly not equal justice under the law.

Learn More 老澳门开奖结果 the Issues on This Page