老澳门开奖结果

President Trump鈥檚 Department of Homeland Security frequently claims to be motivated by a dedication to law and order, but its immigration enforcement tactics are often directly contrary to local communities鈥� legal and electoral choices.

Recent raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in North Carolina were a failed attempt to achieve by force what was soundly rejected at the ballot box last November: Trump鈥檚 anti-immigrant agenda. ICE targeted places and people based on democratic decisions North Carolina counties made about their policing resources and values, including upholding the Constitution.

Sweeping Change Across North Carolina

In the 2018 sheriffs鈥� elections in North Carolina, several long-term incumbents in Wake, Durham, Mecklenburg, Forsyth, and Henderson counties were defeated. Their successors ran 鈥� and won 鈥� on the promise of accountability to the diverse communities that they serve and against being part of Trump鈥檚 deportation force. This included the termination of 287(g) cooperation agreements with ICE that notify federal agents of the immigration status of detained individuals. Immediately, sheriffs began enacting the will of the people.

In North Carolina鈥檚 three most populous counties 鈥� Wake, Mecklenburg, and 鈥� each newly elected sheriff publicly stated their intention to disentangle their local law enforcement work from federal immigration enforcement.

of Mecklenburg County and Sheriff Gerald Baker of Wake County both publicly ended their 287(g) programs, joining other major cities鈥� counties like in considering 287(g) to be to community policing by frightening residents and an unjustified subsidy of federal immigration enforcement by local budgets that have other public safety priorities. Law enforcement leaders such as the say that entangling federal immigration enforcement with state and local policing, as 287(g) does, is mistaken.

In the months since their elections, sheriffs in Forsyth and Henderson counties have now both also made statements about their interest in disentangling from their relationships with ICE. Sheriff Lowell Griffin in Henderson County has stated that their 287(g) program, set to expire at the end February, drains his office of essential financial resources, although it remains to be seen if he will renew the program despite the financial losses incurred by his office.

In Forsyth County, Sheriff Bobby Kimbrough has stated that he will no longer honor ICE detainer requests and will require a judicial warrant: 鈥淲e will not be an extension of immigrant investigations.鈥� He also expressed concern saying, 鈥淏asically, I鈥檓 detaining somebody鈥檚 Fourth Amendment right without due process.鈥�

ICE鈥檚 Retaliatory Detention Rampage in North Carolina

ICE engaged in a five-day statewide operation in North Carolina starting Feb. 5. ICE targeted the three counties 鈥� Wake, Durham, and Mecklenburg 鈥� where sheriffs have publicly ended their collaboration with ICE.

The operation resulted in the detention of over 200 immigrants and was admittedly haphazard in nature, resulting in ICE detaining at least 60 immigrants who were not targets of ICE immigration enforcement, but were simply in the 鈥渨rong place at the wrong time.鈥�

In defending the raids, ICE officials directed their ire at local law enforcement for ending collaboration with ICE. ICE Field Office Director Sean Gallagher named 鈥渢he dangerous policies of not cooperating with ICE,鈥� as the impetus for the operation.

Gallagher went so far as to confirm the indiscriminate detention of immigrants that are not ICE priorities for immigration enforcement, saying, 鈥淚f these [287(g)] programs would be in place, I wouldn鈥檛 have to put so many officers on the street [...] and you would have less people 鈥� like you were talking about 鈥� workers going to work that would be arrested. Absolutely.鈥�

Sheriffs upholding the Constitution are refusing to break the law, not declining to enforce it. But ICE Southern Region Communications Director Bryan Cox was in alleging a lack of cooperation. He said, 鈥淭he reality is now given that the Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Department will no longer cooperate with ICE, ICE has no choice but to send its officers into the community, into neighborhoods, into workplaces to make those same arrests.鈥� ICE is aware of every person booked into these jails through fingerprint sharing: If they want to detain someone, all that鈥檚 needed 鈥� like from every other law enforcement agency 鈥� is a warrant that鈥檚 independently issued by a judge and supported by the Constitution鈥檚 probable cause requirement.

Fighting Back: North Carolinians Are Standing Firm

In the wake of ICE鈥檚 coercive and retaliatory operations across North Carolina, community groups are taking up the important work of rapid response and community building. Groups like , , , , , and are mobilizing with allies to support sheriffs who protect their residents鈥� rights and put serving their communities first.

We support this broad coalition, which includes faith-based and nonprofit organizations, and call on Gov. Roy Cooper to condemn the retaliatory ICE operation in North Carolina. We also call on ICE to be transparent and report publicly about how, where, and why each individual was detained during the operation. North Carolinians voted last November for community policing and respecting the Fourth Amendment, and ICE鈥檚 scare tactics won鈥檛 roll back our progress.