老澳门开奖结果

Earlier this week, a federal appeals court ruled that the CIA can effectively decide for itself what Americans are allowed to learn about the torture committed in their name. At issue in the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 long-running Freedom of Information Act lawsuit was the agency鈥檚 right to withhold secret cables describing waterboarding; a photograph of a detainee, Abu Zubaydah, taken around the time that he was subjected to the 鈥渆nhanced interrogation techniques鈥�; and a short phrase that appears in several Justice Department memos referring to a 鈥渟ource of authority.鈥�

The CIA argued that the cables could be kept hidden because waterboarding is an 鈥渋ntelligence method鈥� exempt from disclosure under FOIA; that the photograph should remain secret because it depicted a detainee in custody during the timeframe of his interrogation; and that the 鈥渟ource of authority鈥� was in fact an 鈥渋ntelligence source or method.鈥�

A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the CIA on all three counts, allowing the CIA to keep secret precisely the sort of information that FOIA was designed to expose: evidence of illegal government conduct. The court also granted the government the Orwellian authority to censor a photograph of a detainee because the photograph might reveal the detainee鈥檚 鈥渃ondition鈥� after being tortured.

Here鈥檚 the New York Times鈥檚 reaction to the decision in an editorial :

The C.I.A. is, generally, entitled to shield legitimate intelligence sources and methods. But the public鈥檚 interest in disclosure in this case was especially strong. And, as the A.C.L.U. argued, unlawful waterboarding is not properly an intelligence method within the scope of the FOIA disclosure exemptions. The government argued, and the judges agreed, that the photo of Mr. Zubaydah would reveal the detainee鈥檚 condition after torture. That is a compelling argument for its release.

The judges should have given the government鈥檚 overwrought claims of national security and secrecy special scrutiny, not extreme deference.

We are particularly disheartened that an administration with a stated commitment to transparency has claimed the need to shield details about waterboarding despite publicly acknowledging that waterboarding is torture. Were any other country to claim that national security required the suppression of details of torture, Americans would be rightfully shocked and incredulous.

Learn more about torture: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .