ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û

"There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people running around with lit matches." — Ray Bradbury, "Fahrenheit 451"

This week marks the 31st annual Banned Books Week, the American Library Association's celebration of the freedom to read. Banned Books Week also serves as an important reminder of our ongoing duty to ensure that our government maintains open access to all kinds of ideas and information. Although some may think that censorship is a relic from a bygone age, the urge to suppress seemingly dangerous or offensive thoughts will exist as long as human beings continue to think. Last year, there were to ban a particular book from a curriculum or library, and many more go unreported. But today, the specter of book burning extends far beyond the library shelves — as more and more information moves online, Internet filtering has become the 21st century's bonfire.

Since its founding in 1920, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û has opposed censorship in all its forms. From books and radio to film, television, and the Internet, we have consistently fought to make sure Americans have the right to say, think, read, and write whatever they want, without fear of government reprisal. In 1926, we defended H.L. Mencken when he was charged with distributing copies of his banned magazine, American Mercury. In 1952, we won Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (aka the "Miracle Decision"), in which the Supreme Court finally struck down film censorship laws. In 1978, we filed a Supreme Court friend-of-the-court brief challenging the government's power to suppress radio broadcasts of George Carlin's "Seven Words You Can't Say On Television." And in 1997, we won Reno v. ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, which held that Internet speech is entitled to full First Amendment protection. And those are just a few of my personal favorites: more of the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's most notable "Banned Book" cases are listed below – and some are from the not-so-distant past.

We are proud of this legacy, but we're not resting on our laurels. In the last five years, we joined in the Supreme Court challenge against the Federal Communications Commission's "fleeting expletive" rule. We successfully challenged the government's ideological exclusion of Professors Tariq Ramadan and Adam Habib from the country's borders. We launched a campaign to prevent public schools throughout the country from filtering LGBT web content. And we continue to challenge the government's use of its surveillance powers in ways that chill individual expression. (See here and here). We remain passionately committed to the First Amendment values that keep our society open. And we will continue to oppose censorship wherever it rears its ugly head.

2002

The Vietnam Reader, various authors
After a parent complained about passages from "The Vietnam Reader" that included violence and were sexually explicit, a committee in the North Kitsap School District in Washington deleted four readings without opening the discussion to members of the community. ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û advocacy resulted in the creation of a policy to provide a fairer process for considering book challenges.

Sophie's Choice, William Styron
The Norwalk-La Mirada High School District in California removed "Sophie's Choice" from the La Mirada High School library shelves after a parent complained about sections of the acclaimed novel. When students expressed concerns that their First Amendment rights were being violated, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û wrote a letter to the school district asking that the book be returned to the school library shelves. The book has since been returned.

2001

Lives of Notable Gay Men and Lesbians, various authors
On behalf of two students, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û sued an Anaheim, Calif., school district for pulling the biographical series "Lives of Notable Gay Men and Lesbians" off a school library's shelves. The school agreed to put the books back and amended its policy regarding censorship of library books.

2000

Harry Potter series, J.K. Rowling
A Zeeland, Mich., school district banned students in grades K-4 from taking the "Harry Potter" books out of the school library and required students in grades 5-8 to obtain parental permission before borrowing them. The policy also forbade teachers from reading the books out loud during classes. After the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û sent letters to the public schools, the district formed a committee to review the issue and rescinded the policy.

1986

As I Lay Dying, William Faulkner
Faulkner's classic was banned in a Mayfield, Ky., school district because it was deemed offensive and obscene. After intense pressure from the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, the school district reversed its decision.

1973

Slaughterhouse Five, Kurt Vonnegut
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û successfully sued a North Dakota school district on behalf of a teacher who taught "Slaughterhouse Five," which was called "a tool of the devil" by a local minister.

1957

Howl and Other Poems, Allen Ginsberg
Poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti contacted the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û to defend the publication of "Howl." U.S. Customs officials had seized the books, stating, "You wouldn't want your children to come across it." A state court judge ruled that the poem could not be suppressed as obscene by local authorities.

1950

Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn, Henry Miller
The director of the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Northern California attempted to import "Tropic of Cancer" and "Tropic of Capricorn." U.S. Customs officials seized the books and the director, Ernest Besig, went to court to defend the works against obscenity charges.

1939

The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck
Along with several other groups, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û protested the Kern County, Calif., Board of Supervisors' resolution banning "The Grapes of Wrath." The board argued that the book "offended our citizenry." Kern County is in the center of the agricultural region featured in the novel.

1933

Ulysses, James Joyce
In one of the organization's most famous cases, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û defended Joyce's "Ulysses" after U.S. Customs officials seized copies of the novel, calling it obscenity "of the rottenest and vilest character." After a decade-long struggle, it was ruled that "Ulysses" was not obscene.

Learn more about censorship and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .