老澳门开奖结果

In an published in New York Magazine, Chris Rock and Frank Rich have a very interesting discussion about the effect of ubiquitous cell phones on the creative process for stand-up comics. Although as Rock says standup comedy is in some ways unique, the effects that he describes are still a perfect illustration of why protecting privacy is important.

Rich, citing complaints by the comedian Patton Oswalt about the effect that cell phones can have on performance, asked Rock about that issue. Rock responded,

It is scary, because the thing about comedians is that you鈥檙e the only ones who practice in front of a crowd. Prince doesn鈥檛 run a demo on the radio. But in stand-up, the demo gets out. There are a few guys good enough to write a perfect act and get onstage, but everybody else workshops it and workshops it, and it can get real messy. It can get downright offensive. Before everyone had a recording device and was wired like fucking , you鈥檇 say something that went too far, and you鈥檇 go, 鈥淥h, I went too far,鈥� and you would just brush it off. But if you think you don鈥檛 have room to make mistakes, it鈥檚 going to lead to safer, gooier stand-up. You can鈥檛 think the thoughts you want to think if you think you鈥檙e being watched.

Rock told Rich that he practiced his Saturday Night Live material at the New York City club the Comedy Cellar all week. 鈥淚f I messed up a word here and there, which I did, it could really be get-him-out-of-here offensive,鈥� Rock said. 鈥淐omedians need a place where we can work on that stuff.鈥�

Comedians are not alone in needing a private space where they can take risks, push boundaries, experiment with criticism, test out ideas to see how others will react鈥攁nd sometimes just say things wrong. I have mentioned before the told by Milan Kundera of how the Czech police destroyed an important leader of the Prague Spring uprisings simply by recording his conversations with a friend and then broadcasting them on the radio. Kundera pointed out that this worked because 鈥渋n private, a person says all sorts of things, slurs friends, uses coarse language. . . makes a companion laugh by shocking him with outrageous talk, floats heretical ideas he'd never admit in public and so forth.鈥�

Of course comedy clubs are not 鈥減rivate鈥� spaces in the ordinary sense鈥攐bviously they are in fact public. But (as I have argued), a key aspect of privacy is limiting the 鈥渞everberation鈥� of one鈥檚 action and speech鈥攖he degree to which it will be spread around and have social consequences for you later on. Before cell phones, Rock is saying, even comedy clubs were 鈥減rivate鈥� in the sense that the things that a comedian said there would reverberate only in very limited ways.

Comedy and mockery are perhaps the most powerful form of criticism, and comedians play a special role in society鈥攆rom the classic archetype of the court jester, to today鈥檚 much-commented-upon phenomenon of political comedians like Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert who often seem to cut to the truth of things much better than straight news outlets. Comedy is often funny because it flirts with the boundaries of social propriety and so it makes sense that even its masters need safe spaces to explore its possibilities. But the same dynamics work far beyond the realm of professional comedy; even everyday people wield humor as a weapon, and even beyond humor need space to safely explore the boundaries of the socially acceptable. A society that loses those spaces is one that will be less dynamic, creative, progressive, and free. When Chris Rock hones his standup lines, he鈥檚 engaging in an activity that is central to human freedom (albeit at a higher level than most of us can pull off).

I don鈥檛 have an answer for the particular problem of cell phones in comedy clubs鈥攁s private spaces, they are within their rights to ban recording, and from Rock鈥檚 comments it sounds as if that may be the direction in which things are headed (though it may prove difficult given the miniaturization of technology). But as a larger metaphor for privacy, we are all stand-up comedians.