老澳门开奖结果

Congress is poised to give final passage to legislation that would give a big boost to domestic unmanned aerial surveillance 鈥� aka 鈥渄rones.鈥�

As we explained in our recent report, drone technology is advancing by leaps and bounds, and there is a lot of pent-up demand for them within the law enforcement community. But, domestic deployment of unmanned aircraft for surveillance purposes has largely been blocked so far by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which is rightly concerned about the safety effects of filling our skies with flying robots (which crash significantly more often than manned aircraft).

As we also explained in our report, the FAA is under pressure to loosen the reins and permit broader deployment of drones by government agencies.

One result of that pressure is this legislation (H.R. 658 鈥� see for more details), which authorizes appropriations for the FAA through fiscal 2014. Unfortunately, nothing in the bill would address the very serious privacy issues raised by drone aircraft. This bill would push the nation willy-nilly toward an era of aerial surveillance without any steps to protect the traditional privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and expected.

Congress 鈥� and to the extent possible, the FAA 鈥� need to impose some rules (such as those we proposed in our report) to protect Americans鈥� privacy from the inevitable invasions that this technology will otherwise lead to. We don鈥檛 want to wonder, every time we step out our front door, whether some eye in the sky is watching our every move.

On Friday, the House gave final passage to the legislation. House approval came on a quite , with most Republicans in favor and most Democrats opposing. The Senate is scheduled to take up the bill later today.

Here are details on what the bill would do in terms of drones:

鈥� Require the FAA to simplify and speed up the process by which it issues permission to government agencies to operate drones. It must do this within 90 days. The FAA has already been working on a set of proposed regulations to loosen the rules around drones, reportedly set for release in the spring of 2012.
鈥� Require the FAA to allow 鈥渁 government public safety agency鈥� to operate any drone weighing 4.4 pounds or less as long as certain conditions are met (within line of sight, during the day, below 400 feet in altitude, and only in safe categories of airspace).
鈥� Require the FAA to establish a pilot project within six months to create six test zones for integrating drones 鈥渋nto the national airspace system.鈥�
鈥� Require the FAA to create a comprehensive plan 鈥渢o safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.鈥� 鈥淐ivil鈥� drones means those operated by the private sector; currently it is all but impossible for any non-government entity, except for hobbyists, to get permission to fly drones (for-profit use of drones is banned). Industry groups and their congressional supporters see this as a potential area for growth. Congress specifies that the plan must provide for the integration of drones into the national airspace system 鈥渁s soon as practicable, but not later than September 30, 2015.鈥� The FAA has nine months to create the plan. The FAA is also required to create a 鈥�5-year roadmap for the introduction鈥� of civil drones into the national airspace.
鈥� Require the FAA to publish a final rule within 18 months after the comprehensive plan is submitted, 鈥渢hat will allow鈥� civil operation of small (under 55 pounds) drones in the national airspace, and a proposed rule for carrying out the comprehensive plan.

The bottom line is: domestic drones are potentially extremely powerful surveillance tools, and that power 鈥� like all government power 鈥� needs to be subject to checks and balances. We hope that Congress will carefully consider the privacy implications that this technology can lead to.

Learn more about surveillance: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .