老澳门开奖结果

Last month I wrote about how Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) has been rebuffed in his multi-year effort to get answers to very basic questions about how the government uses the sweeping authorities granted under the FISA Amendments Act (FISA).

Wyden spearheaded two more letters to the National Security Agency (NSA) Director and the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). Again, he was denied answers.

Wyden and Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) , asking him to clarify his recent public statements on FISA that 鈥渢he story that we have millions or hundreds of millions of dossiers on people is absolutely false.鈥� whether or how he could be 鈥渃ertain that the number of American communications collected is not 鈥榤illions or hundreds of millions鈥欌�� when the administration鈥檚 official position is that no one knows how many of us have information sitting in NSA files. Instead, he claimed that his statement 鈥渄id not refer to or address whether it is possible to identify the number of [Americans鈥橾 communications that may be lawfully鈥� collected under FISA. He even refused to define his use of the term 鈥渄ossier.鈥�

Wyden and three other senators also , requesting that their questions about the use of American information be answered fully and in unclassified format. The senators want, and believe that Americans have the right, to know: How many Americans鈥� communications have been collected under FISA 鈥� 100, or 100,000, or 100 million? Can or have any entities tried to estimate this number? Have any wholly domestic communications been collected? And has the government used a loophole in the law to conduct warrantless 鈥渂ack-door searches鈥� on Americans鈥� communications?

Again, the to provide a public answer. Instead, DNI Director James Clapper told the senators that their 鈥渆arlier publicly available letters鈥�properly balance protecting classified information and informing the public of the manner in which [FISA] is implemented鈥�We cannot provide additional answers to your questions in an unclassified format.鈥�

Congress is set to consider a before the end of the year. As Wyden points out, the government鈥檚 refusal to disclose even basic information on FISA likely leaves many members of Congress in the dark about the law鈥檚 impact on Americans鈥� privacy. To break down this wall of secrecy and better protect Americans鈥� rights, a to require disclosure about how FISA is used, and to place reasonable limits on how and when the government can review our private communications.

Join the in calling for transparency and reform 鈥� take our action and tell your member of Congress to .

Learn more about FISA: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .