The 老澳门开奖结果 released documents last week indicating that the criminal investigative arm of the IRS doesn鈥檛 think it always needs a warrant to read people鈥檚 email when investigating them for tax crimes. The revelation garnered widespread media attention (see examples , , and ). We called on the IRS to clarify its policy but, unfortunately, the agency issued only a brief, confusing that failed to explain its actual policy and practices. As we said last week, because our emails, text messages, and other electronic communications contain some of our most sensitive and private information, it is crucial that federal law enforcement agencies obtain a warrant from a neutral judge before accessing them.
The documents we released put a spotlight on the IRS, but the problem is much broader. The IRS is likely not alone in taking advantage of a huge loophole in the outdated law that is supposed to ensure the privacy of electronic communications, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). Under ECPA, law enforcement does not need a warrant to read emails and other electronic communications that are stored on a server for more than 180 days or that have been opened by the recipient. Maybe that distinction had some basis in 1986, when ECPA was written, but as the Department of Justice recently , it 鈥渘o longer make[s] sense鈥 today.
Calls to reform ECPA are mounting: allies from across the political spectrum are urging Congress to require a warrant for all electronic communications, and major email providers (as well as Facebook) are to provide their users鈥 private communications to law enforcement without a probable cause warrant. This year is our best opportunity yet to protect the privacy of our emails, text messages, and other electronic communications.
The IRS shouldn鈥檛 be claiming the authority to read our emails without a warrant, but neither should any other law enforcement agency. Do you expect your email to be private? If so, you can use to tell Congress to modernize our electronic privacy law and close the loophole that鈥檚 letting the government access email and other electronic communications without a warrant.