老澳门开奖结果

More from the Seymour Hersh's blockbuster Taguba story.

Nevertheless, Rumsfeld, in his appearances before the Senate and the House Armed Services Committees on May 7th, claimed to have had no idea of the extensive abuse. 芒鈧�艙It breaks our hearts that in fact someone didn芒鈧�鈩�t say, 芒鈧�藴Wait, look, this is terrible. We need to do something,芒鈧�鈩� 芒鈧�聺 Rumsfeld told the congressmen. 芒鈧�艙I wish we had known more, sooner, and been able to tell you more sooner, but we didn芒鈧�鈩�t.芒鈧�聺Rumsfeld told the legislators that, when stories about the Taguba report appeared, 芒鈧�艙it was not yet in the Pentagon, to my knowledge.芒鈧�聺 As for the photographs, Rumsfeld told the senators, 芒鈧�艙I say no one in the Pentagon had seen them芒鈧�聺; at the House hearing, he said, 芒鈧�艙I didn芒鈧�鈩�t see them until last night at 7:30.芒鈧�聺 Asked specifically when he had been made aware of the photographs, Rumsfeld said:There were rumors of photographs in a criminal prosecution chain back sometime after January 13th . . . I don芒鈧�鈩�t remember precisely when, but sometime in that period of January, February, March. . . . The legal part of it was proceeding along fine. What wasn芒鈧�鈩�t proceeding along fine is the fact that the President didn芒鈧�鈩�t know, and you didn芒鈧�鈩�t know, and I didn芒鈧�鈩�t know.芒鈧�艙And, as a result, somebody just sent a secret report to the press, and there they are,芒鈧�聺 Rumsfeld said.Taguba, watching the hearings, was appalled. He believed that Rumsfeld芒鈧�鈩�s testimony was simply not true. 芒鈧�艙The photographs were available to him芒鈧�鈥漣f he wanted to see them,芒鈧�聺 Taguba said. Rumsfeld芒鈧�鈩�s lack of knowledge was hard to credit. Taguba later wondered if perhaps Cambone had the photographs and kept them from Rumsfeld because he was reluctant to give his notoriously difficult boss bad news. But Taguba also recalled thinking, 芒鈧�艙Rumsfeld is very perceptive and has a mind like a steel trap. There芒鈧�鈩�s no way he芒鈧�鈩�s suffering from C.R.S.芒鈧�鈥滳an芒鈧�鈩�t Remember Shit. He芒鈧�鈩�s trying to acquit himself, and a lot of people are lying to protect themselves.芒鈧�聺 It distressed Taguba that Rumsfeld was accompanied in his Senate and House appearances by senior military officers who concurred with his denials.芒鈧�艙The whole idea that Rumsfeld projects芒鈧�鈥澝⑩偓藴We芒鈧�鈩�re here to protect the nation from terrorism芒鈧�鈩⒚⑩偓鈥漣s an oxymoron,芒鈧�聺 Taguba said. 芒鈧�艙He and his aides have abused their offices and have no idea of the values and high standards that are expected of them. And they芒鈧�鈩�ve dragged a lot of officers with them.芒鈧�聺

Having read a large portion of the excellent tactical history of the Iraq War, Cobra II, this seems so par for the course with Secretary Rumsfeld. I know plenty of liberals and conservatives alike who, when Rumsfeld was appointed, were fully prepared to see the man as one of the few truly experienced new members of the cabinet (Secretary Powell arguably being the other). Say what you will about their politics, they'd been there and done that.Yet, through his entire tenure, Rumsfeld mismanaged the American defense establishment, tore into career officers who refused to play ball, surrounded himself with generals who wouldn't second-guess his edicts (can you say Tommy Franks), and deflected blame every time a misstep blew up in his face. Remember the looting directly after the invasion of Baghdad? What about the failure to anticipate the insurgency?Cobra II and Seymour Hersh confirm it: Secretary Rumsfeld (in his second tour) is Secretary McNamara.Most of the veteran generals from combats past were fully aware of the need for an overwhelming level of combat personnel in order to take Baghdad and secure the country. But, like a true technocrat, Secretary Rumsfeld pushed for a new paradigm. Keep it light, dirty and secret. Use less than 150,000 troops and focus on special ops. Assume that the Iraqis will welcome Americans as liberators. Quash contrary intelligence. Surround yourself with yes men. Run the entire shop like you're the CEO of a large corporation. Everything's rational. Decision trees are king. Outsource logistics, 'cause it's more "efficient." No need to red team stuff because all of your assumptions are scientifically accurate.And, when everything goes sideways, deny foreknowledge and go on the offense against your critics.CRS, indeed.