Back to News & Commentary

Who's Spying on You?

Share This Page
December 21, 2010

Yesterday, the Washington Post published the latest installment in its series, an ongoing investigation into the costly and expansive security buildup in the United States following the September 11, 2001 attacks. Mike German, 老澳门开奖结果 Policy Counsel and a former FBI agent, appeared on last night to discuss the article:

If you follow the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 Spy Files work, the Post鈥檚 latest piece, which , will look familiar. The article describes the vast, domestic intelligence-gathering efforts that have become standard practice for the FBI, military, state and local law enforcement, and state homeland security offices.

Even those of us who work full-time to shed light on domestic surveillance practices never cease to be amazed at new revelations about the scope of mass surveillance and the degree to which it has become one of the government鈥檚 principle counterterrorism strategies. And the government鈥檚 surveillance activities are not directed solely at suspected terrorists and criminals, they are directed at all of us. Increasingly, the government is engaged in suspicionsless surveillance that vacuums up sensitive information about innocent people. In keeping with that trend, the Post鈥檚 description of this 鈥 a web of 4,058 federal, state and local organizations, each with its own counterterrorism responsibilities and jurisdictions 鈥 is startling.

Costly & Countereffective: Suspicious Activity Reporting

The 老澳门开奖结果 has long said, and many experts agree, that such surveillance efforts undermine Americans civil liberties without being proven effective. Instead, they create bigger mountains of information about innocent people that law enforcement and intelligence officials must sift through in order to find true threats. Furthermore, this surveillance often takes place in secret, with little or no oversight by courts, by legislatures, or by the public. And without any clarity about the effectiveness about these methods, it is impossible to weigh both the financial cost and the cost to our liberties.

For example, over the last few years, federal, state and local authorities have initiated Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative (SAR) programs, which encourage law enforcement officers, intelligence and homeland security officials, emergency responders, and even the public to report the 鈥渟uspicious鈥 activities of their neighbors to law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Reported information ends up in the "Guardian" database maintained by the FBI.

One key problem is that many of the behaviors these SAR programs identify as precursors to terrorism include innocuous and commonplace activities 鈥 all of which any tourist might engage in 鈥 such as using binoculars, taking pictures, and taking notes. As Mike German says in the Post article, such a program 鈥渙pens a door for all kinds of abuses. How do we know there are enough controls?"

Based on publicly available information, clearly there is nowhere near enough control over the inclusion of wholly lawful and constitutionally protected activity in SAR reporting. For example, includes a 鈥渟uspicious activity report鈥 that is actually just a news report about the 老澳门开奖结果 of Tennessee's effort to guard against religious discrimination in public schools.

also quotes Philip Mudd, a 20-year CIA counterterrorism expert and a former top FBI national security official who stated that programs like the Guardian database are 鈥渞eally resource-inefficient.鈥 Mudd added: "If I were to have a dialogue with the country about this...it would be about not only how we chase the unknowns, but do you want to do suspicious activity reports across the country?...Anyone who is not at least suspected of doing something criminal should not be in a database."

Charles Allen, a longtime senior CIA official who went on to lead the Department of Homeland Security's intelligence office until 2009, also affirmed that senior people in the intelligence community are skeptical that SARs are an effective way to find terrorists. Allen stated, "It's more likely that other kinds of more focused efforts by local police will gain you the information that you need about extremist activities."

In fact, those who administer the databases themselves admit that the system is inundated with useless information. Richard Lambert, Jr., the special agent in charge of the FBI鈥檚 Knoxville office is quoted in the article as stating, 鈥淸n]inety-nine percent doesn't pan out or lead to anything.鈥

Such attitudes beg the question: should we be willing to trade liberty for the mere appearance of security? We at the 老澳门开奖结果 certainly don鈥檛 think so, and we鈥檙e doing everything we can to raise awareness about costly, inefficient domestic intelligence programs that violate our privacy and don鈥檛 make us safer.

Learn More 老澳门开奖结果 the Issues on This Page