老澳门开奖结果

Indiana has one of the most expansive private school voucher programs in the country, courtesy of Mike Pence. During his time as governor, Pence 鈥渞emoved the cap on the number of students who could qualify for a voucher to a private school, increased the limits on qualifying family income, and removed [a] stipulation that the student had to try the public school first,鈥� according to of the state鈥檚 school choice failures by The Washington Post yesterday.

The result?

Last year alone, Indiana taxpayers financed private school education 鈥� nearly all religious 鈥� to the tune of $146.1 million 鈥渨ith most of it going to families who would have sent their children to private school anyway.鈥� Oh, and by the way, a in grades 3-8 who actually did use the voucher to transfer from a public to a private school showed that the voucher program had a negative impact on students鈥� academic achievement.

Those are the type of important details you didn鈥檛 hear or read last week from voucher proponents who dubbed the week, 鈥淣ational School Choice Week.鈥� President Trump issued an recognizing the 鈥渃elebration,鈥� while school choice supporters, such as Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and Pence, wrote and deluged with platitudes about empowering parents and helping children achieve the 鈥淎merican dream.鈥� There鈥檚 no question that parents should feel empowered when it comes to their child鈥檚 education, or that every student should be positioned to pursue their dreams, but that is not what the 鈥渟chool choice鈥� movement is really about.

Rather 鈥渟chool choice鈥� is a catch-all phrase that covers a variety of efforts by diverting public education funds to private sources. It includes home schooling, charter schools, and virtual education, but it is mostly code for private school vouchers and similar programs, such as education savings accounts and tax credit scholarship programs. The school choice movement has been around for decades, working to expand its reach school district by school district and state by state.

With the election of President Trump and Vice President Pence and the appointment of Secretary DeVos, the movement has received an alarming boost. But it鈥檚 not the panacea that Trump and others claim. And privatizing public education in this way has serious consequences for students, civil rights, equality, and religious liberty.

As an initial matter, decades of studies show that vouchers generally do not improve educational outcomes. For example, a found a statistically significant negative impact on math achievement for voucher students overall. Likewise, kindergarten through fifth-grade students, who comprise the majority of the students in the program, were beset by statistically significant negative impacts in both reading and math. Meanwhile, participation in the voucher program had no statistically significant effect on student or parent satisfaction or students鈥� perception of safety.

Studies of voucher programs in , , and Milwaukee, among others, likewise found negative or negligible impacts on students鈥� academic performance. Indeed, a of Milwaukee鈥檚 program, published yesterday, found that 鈥渧ouchers worked best when enrollment from voucher students was kept low.鈥� However, 鈥淸a]s the percentage of voucher students rises, the returns diminish until the point when there is little difference between the performance of public and private institutions.鈥� And, 鈥淸t]he vast majority of private schools participating in the program today have high percentages of publicly funded students.鈥�

In other words, to be even mildly successful, voucher programs will not be able to assist all students. They cannot be the cure-all that proponents promise because the more voucher students a school takes on, the greater the negative impact on students鈥� academic performance.

Civil rights protections are also undermined by school voucher programs. Private voucher schools do not have the same obligations as public schools under federal law to protect students from harassment and discrimination. Unlike public schools, private voucher schools can discriminate against students based on their religion, , , academic achievement, and disciplinary history. In fact, according to , only four voucher programs across the country required private schools to accept all students with vouchers, space permitting. Students in voucher schools also lose key First Amendment rights, due process rights, and other rights protected by the U.S. Constitution in public schools.

Accountability is , increasing the risk that the few rights retained by voucher students will be violated, that taxpayer funds will be mismanaged, and that the quality of the education provided by the school will be inferior. For instance, many voucher schools that receive taxpayer funds are not required to meet any standards for teacher qualifications, testing, or achievement. In some states, private school teachers need not even have a bachelor鈥檚 degree, and only 11 states require that voucher schools be accredited, meaning that voucher funds are often used to pay for tuition at unaccredited schools.

Many voucher schools, moreover, are religious. Schools not only discriminate against students and employees based on religion and other grounds, as noted above, but they also do not have to meet the same curricular requirements that public schools do. Many religious voucher schools, for example, teach creationism in science class. They also incorporate religious worship into the curriculum in the form of chapel, daily prayer, or daily scriptural readings and infringe upon basic principles of religious liberty by providing public funds for sectarian proselytizing.

These are just some of the facts about vouchers and school choice that President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Secretary DeVos won鈥檛 tell you. We鈥檒l continue to shine a light on how these programs fail students and undermine our public schools as proponents push them without regard to their effects on students鈥� academic performance, civil rights, and religious liberty.