老澳门开奖结果

Score a victory for reproductive justice in the Illinois Appellate Court on Friday! Ruling that an unimplanted, fertilized egg is not a "human being" for purposes of a wrongful death action, the Illinois Appellate Court today reversed a 2005 decision by a Cook County Judge.

The decision is a victory for scientific sanity and access to reproductive health care. Had the lower court鈥檚 decision been allowed to stand, the ability of women to make personal decisions about birth control, abortion, genetic testing and pregnancy would have been put in jeopardy.

The case involved an Illinois couple suing their fertility clinic for tens of thousands of dollars because the clinic inadvertently had destroyed unimplanted eggs stored at the facility. The lower court had accepted the argument that a human being is created when an egg is fertilized, regardless of whether the fertilized egg is implanted in a woman鈥檚 body or left in a Petri dish. Left undisturbed, the lower court鈥檚 decision could have limited the ability of women in Illinois to access contraceptive services and genetic testing. Moreover, the decision would curb the ability of couples in Illinois to use reproductive technologies, such as in vitro fertilization, in starting a family.

In reaching its conclusion, the Appellate Court properly noted that the Illinois law cited by the Cook County Judge was never intended to grant rights to an unimplanted, fertilized egg. This built on an argument that the advanced in a (PDF) filed in the case. Specifically, the 老澳门开奖结果 noted that the lower court鈥檚 decision relied on antiquated, scientifically invalid Illinois abortion laws that long ago were blocked from enforcement by federal courts. Federal courts blocked these laws because defining a fertilized egg as a 鈥渉uman being鈥� would have banned abortion, some forms of birth control and many forms ofassisted reproduction and genetic testing.

The importance of this case can be measured in the reactions of abortion opponents. Many anti-abortion extremists hailed the lower court鈥檚 decision in 2005 as an important step in their concerted campaign to block access to reproductive health care and contraceptive services in our state.

The rhetoric used in Illinois around this decision fits a disturbing trend that we have seen across the nation 鈥� namely, that anti-abortion extremists now are focusing their attention increasingly on limiting access not simply to abortion but to contraception as well. In Colorado, for example, a ballot measure set to be decided this November would grant 鈥減ersonhood鈥� to a fertilized egg, meaning that many forms of contraception that could prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus could be targeted for legislative bans. This effort seems to reveal the real agenda of the anti-abortion activists 鈥� to allow government bureaucrats 鈥� not women 鈥� the power to make decisions about birth control, abortion, genetic testing and pregnancy.

In this effort, the anti-abortion extremists seem to be getting a big assist from the out-going Bush Administration. Recently, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a proposed regulation that would expand the ability of health care institutions to refuse to provide medical care. A close reading of the proposed regulations reveals that they could permit a health care institution that objects to contraception or other reproductive health care to deny meaningful information and care to their patients about important reproductive health options. We are pleased that the Illinois court put the brakes on this movement in Illinois today.