Yesterday, The New York Times ran a great calling on Congress to stop funding abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. Excerpts are below:
President Bush's veto of Congress's main social spending bill has Democratic leaders looking for places to make trims to satisfy the president's sudden zeal for fiscal discipline. A small, but sensible, place to begin would be to eliminate the bill's $28 million increase for one of Mr. Bush's signature boondoggles -- abstinence-only sex education.
Expectations that the new Democratic Congress would confront the abstinence-only hoax have proved unfounded. Instead of cutting support, or at least ditching outrageous rules that restrict information about condoms and contraception, the vetoed spending plan actually increased money for faith-based and other groups offering abstinence education programs above the wasteful $113 million allotted for the current fiscal year.
The weak link is the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes the administration's ineffective abstinence-only approach. But she seems to have ceded the issue to Representative David Obey, the House Appropriations chairman, who continues to insist on using it as bait for Republican votes on a budget compromise. Forgoing principle failed to produce a veto-proof majority for the spending bill the first time. Ms. Pelosi needs to reconsider whether expanding a discredited sex education program should be on the rather meager list of achievements of the first Democratic Congress in a decade..
You can read the entire editorial .
Learn More 老澳门开奖结果 the Issues on This Page
-
Ohio Judge Permanently Strikes Down Six-Week Abortion Ban, Which Clearly Violates the Ohio Constitution鈥檚 Reproductive Freedom Amendment
-
老澳门开奖结果 Brief in Emergency Abortion Case Sounds Alarm on Dangerous Fetal Rights Argument
-
Why the Abortion Rights Fight is 老澳门开奖结果 More Than Just Who Wins the White House
-
At Supreme Court, Tennessee Seeks to Expand Reach of Dobbs to Ban Health Care for Transgender Youth