ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û

BOSTON — In a case raising questions similar to those in FBI v. Apple, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Massachusetts today filed a motion in federal court to make public basic information about a case suspected to involve a government attempt to use the All Writs Act of 1789 to compel Apple to unlock an encrypted device in Massachusetts.

"Transparency is more important than ever now that the government has dropped its request to force Apple to access data on a locked iPhone in the San Bernardino case," said Jessie Rossman, staff attorney with the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Massachusetts. "The FBI would have us believe that their recent attempt was exceptional, but it was not. Research conducted by the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Massachusetts and the national ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û revealed yesterday more than 60 cases in which the government invoked the All Writs Act to attempt to conscript Apple or Google to break into personal electronic devices. Going back as far as 2008, these requests span more than 20 states."

In the cases the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û identified, many of the individual documents — including All Writs Act applications and orders — are sealed, but the existence of these documents is almost universally made public. In contrast, a government affidavit filed in a Massachusetts case references a request to compel Apple to unlock an iPhone, but the public case docket contains no other entries associated with such a request, not even an All Writs Act application or an order. The absence of these entries suggests that there may be a sealed docket sheet listing these items. Making any such sealed dockets public — or divulging that they do not exist — would reveal whether the government filed a formal All Writs Act application against Apple, whether the company opposed it, and whether the court granted it.

"We are taking this action in order to better understand how government authorities have attempted to use the All Writs Act of 1789 to defeat 21st-century technology," said Matthew Segal, legal director of the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Massachusetts. "We hope this case will inform the ongoing public debate about digital security taking place in Massachusetts and across the country."

"Hundreds of millions of ordinary people worldwide rely on secure technology every day for business transactions and personal communication. Our national debate over this critical issue must take place in full public view," said Carol Rose, ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Massachusetts executive director.

For details about the All Writs Act cases revealed by the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, go to:

/blog/speak-freely/map-shows-how-apple-fbi-fight-was-about-much-more-one-phone

For details about the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Massachusetts motion to unseal, go to:

For more information about the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û of Massachusetts, go to: