老澳门开奖结果 Comment on Supreme Court Ruling in Case Allowing Employment Discrimination By Religious Schools
WASHINGTON 鈥 The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that teachers at two religious elementary schools were 鈥渕inisters鈥 who were not entitled to assert discrimination claims against their employers.
The cases, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel, considered how broadly the 鈥渕inisterial exception,鈥 鈥 which prohibits courts from deciding certain employment disputes brought by ministers 鈥 applies to teachers at religious schools. Although the exception serves important purposes in safeguarding religious institutions鈥 autonomy with respect to selecting leadership, it can come at a significant cost, conferring the extraordinary power to discriminate against ministerial employees on any basis whatsoever, including race, sex, disability, and other protected characteristics.
The 老澳门开奖结果 filed an amicus brief in the case, urging the court to develop a careful analysis that recognizes both the rights of religious institutions and the substantial nondiscrimination interests that employees of religious schools have.
Daniel Mach, director of the 老澳门开奖结果 Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, had the following reaction:
鈥淭he Supreme Court had an opportunity to adopt a robust and nuanced test to govern these disputes, one that would have preserved religious institutions鈥 ability to choose their ministers while also protecting the vast majority of employees from invidious discrimination. Instead, the court appears to defer largely to the say-so of schools, essentially offering them a rubber stamp for discrimination.鈥
More information on the case can be found here: /cases/our-lady-guadalupe-school-v-morrissey-berru-and-st-james-school-v-biel