ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org

LEARN MORE
> Blog: Gitmo Hearings Resume
> News: Supreme Court Should Declare Guantánamo Bay Military Commissions Illegal
> Lawsuit: Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

NEW YORK - The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û will be observing the military tribunals that resume this week at the Guantánamo Bay navy base. The Pentagon is moving forward with the hearings even though the legitimacy of the hearings is currently under review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Jamil Dakwar, a staff attorney with the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Human Rights Working Group, is attending the hearings and will post his observations to the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's blog at:

"The military commissions at Guantánamo are, at best, a legal black hole where detainees are not afforded anything remotely resembling due process," Dakwar said. "The current tribunal system allows abuses of power to go unchecked, and is fundamentally at odds with the U.S. Constitution and international human rights law."

So far, only 10 men have been formally charged with crimes out of about 500 detainees currently being held at Guantánamo. The lack of due process at the camp, and revelations of detainee abuse, have led to calls to close the camp from officials and human rights groups around the world.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 28 in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which challenges the commissions established by President Bush as inconsistent with the Geneva Conventions and unauthorized by Congress. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û filed a brief with the Court in January arguing that congressional authorization cannot be presumed in the absence of a clear statement for two basic reasons. First, the commission rules do not guarantee either independence or impartiality, and are therefore deficient under any recognized legal standard. Second, the commissions discriminate against non-citizens in unprecedented fashion.

For the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û blog, go to:

For links to ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's brief in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld and the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û's blog on the Supreme Court arguments, go to: www.aclu.org/ scotus/2005 /hamdanv.rumsfeld05184 /24755prs20060328.html