老澳门开奖结果

PROVIDENCE, R.I. 鈥� The legal team representing women student-athletes at Brown University who brought suit in June following cuts to the varsity athletics program announced today that it and the University have reached a that will preserve gender equity for women athletes at Brown. The settlement will ensure that Brown adheres to its promise, made more than two decades ago, to comply with Title IX, the federal law that guarantees equal access to athletic programs for female athletes.

Under the settlement, Brown has agreed to reinstate its women鈥檚 varsity equestrian and fencing teams. It has further agreed to maintain full support for those teams and not to reduce future support as compared to men鈥檚 teams鈥� support. Brown also agreed not to eliminate or reduce the status of any women鈥檚 varsity team or add any men鈥檚 team for at least the next four years, during which the University will be required to comply with the consent decree it agreed to in 1998. The consent decree will expire on August 31, 2024, but the University must still ensure equal opportunities in its athletics programs under Title IX. The settlement by attorneys Lynette Labinger, cooperating counsel from the 老澳门开奖结果 of Rhode Island, Leslie Brueckner of Public Justice and Arthur Bryant, now with the law firm of Bailey & Glasser, the attorneys who represented the plaintiffs in the Cohen v Brown suit that resulted in the school agreeing to the original consent decree and by attorneys Jill Zwagerman and Lori Bullock, of Newkirk Zwagerman in Des Moines, Iowa, who joined the legal team in 2020 to take on this challenge.

Lynette Labinger, lead counsel for the Plaintiffs stated: 鈥淲e are very pleased to report that we have convinced Brown that compliance with its obligations under Title IX and the 1998 agreement will result in the restoration of two of the varsity teams for women that it had slated for elimination. This is a bittersweet outcome, because of the reality that, if Brown was determined to shrink the size of its athletic program, we could not stop it and save all five of the women鈥檚 teams. But through our efforts and the overwhelming contributions and energy of the student-athletes, we have ensured that Brown will provide meaningful participation opportunities for more women athletes and not simply push numbers around on a page. We support the settlement because we believe that it will both preserve gender equity and maximize the athletic opportunities for Brown鈥檚 women athletes now and in the future.鈥�

Earlier this year, Brown announced it was eliminating five varsity women鈥檚 teams, a decision that violated the court-ordered requirement that 鈥渋ntercollegiate level participation opportunities for male and female students are provided in numbers substantially proportionate to their respective enrollments.鈥� The cuts announced by Brown would have resulted in a disproportionate impact on women鈥檚 representation in the University鈥檚 athletics programs, running afoul of the maximum gender disparity allowed under the original consent decree. The legal team representing Brown athletes told the court that such cuts would result in 鈥渋mmediate and irreparable harm.鈥�

鈥淏rown鈥檚 internal emails disclosed that its administrators were fixated on the fact that Brown, alone among its peers, was subject to the Joint Agreement and wanted to, in its words, 鈥榢ill this pestilential thing,鈥欌�� said Arthur Bryant of Bailey & Glasser, LLP, the women鈥檚 co-counsel, now and in the original suit for Public Justice. 鈥淭hat showed us Brown had -- and has -- a fundamental misunderstanding of Title IX, which the Joint Agreement embodies. We could agree to end the agreement in four years to get Brown to provide real participation opportunities for many more women athletes than it wanted now. We are confident that, after four years, women athletes at Brown will have at least as much protection under Title IX than they had under the Joint Agreement, or we would never have agreed to let it end. Title IX requires gender equity. If Brown University violates Title IX, we鈥檒l be back.鈥�

鈥淲e are pleased that Brown has recognized its obligations to women athletes and its obligations under the law,鈥� added Public Justice Senior Attorney Leslie Brueckner. 鈥淎t a time when our country is striving to become more equal, and is beginning to acknowledge and address the sins of the past, Brown should be setting the standard for inclusiveness and opportunity. Today鈥檚 settlement is a welcome step in that direction.鈥�

鈥淲e could not require Brown to restore all of the women's teams it eliminated, but we did force Brown to comply with the consent decree and Title IX -- and provide gender equity to its female student-athletes,鈥� said Lori Bullock of Newkirk Zwagerman, co-counsel in the case along with the firm鈥檚 Jill Zwagerman. 鈥淲e are proud to have made it do that. We are honored to advocate for and represent these amazing young women, who are extraordinarily accomplished in and passionate about their sports.鈥�

A copy of a and the , along with background information on the case, Cohen v. Brown University, can be found .