Court Permanently Strikes Down Montana Law That Restricts Voting Rights of Native Americans
BILLINGS, Mont. 鈥� A Montana court permanently struck down a state law today that severely restricted the right to vote for Indigenous people living on rural reservations.
Western Native Voice v. Stapleton, filed in March of this year by the 老澳门开奖结果, 老澳门开奖结果 of Montana, and Native American Rights Fund (NARF), challenged the so-called Montana Ballot Interference Prevention Act (BIPA), a law that imposed severe restrictions on ballot collection efforts that are critical to Native American voters living on rural reservations.
The law set an arbitrary limit on the number of ballots an individual could collect and also restricted the categories of individuals who were permitted to collect ballots. These limitations were intended to suppress turnout on rural reservations, where geographic and socioeconomic barriers to voting make ballot collection even more critical.
In the introduction of the order the court wrote, 鈥渢he questions presented cannot be viewed through the lens of our own upbringings or own life experiences, but through the lens of the cold, hard data that was presented at trial about the clear limitations Native American communities in Montana face, and how the costs associated with 鈥� (鈥淏IPA鈥�) are simply too high and too burdensome to remain the law of the State of Montana.鈥�
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Western Native Voice and Montana Native Vote, Native American-led organizations focused on getting out the vote and increasing civic participation in the Native American community; and the Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of Fort Peck, Blackfeet Nation, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Crow Tribe, and Fort Belknap Indian Community.
In a state where the majority of individuals vote by mail, rural tribal communities work with get-out-the-vote organizers who collect and transport ballots to election offices that would otherwise be inaccessible because of distance, lack of access to transportation or other socio-economic barriers.
These ballot collection efforts are often the only way Native Americans living on rural reservations can access the vote. BIPA would have effectively ended this practice, disenfranchising Native American voters en masse.
Hear directly from Western Native Voice organizers:
The following is reaction to today鈥檚 ruling:
Alora Thomas-Lundborg, senior staff attorney, 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 Voting Rights Project: 鈥淭his ruling is a major victory for voting rights and for thousands of Native Americans in Montana who can now vote without this barrier in the way.鈥�
Alex Rate, legal director, 老澳门开奖结果 of Montana: 鈥淲e are celebrating this ruling. Indigenous people have historically been and continue to be disenfranchised, and BIPA was yet another barrier standing in the way of Indigenous people exercising their fundamental right to vote. Ballot collection efforts are an important way to get out the vote on rural reservations, and with this ruling those efforts can proceed.鈥�
Natalie Landreth, staff attorney, NARF: 鈥淭oday the court held that BIPA is unconstitutional and is permanently enjoined. This means that this election, Indian people in Montana can get the help they so sorely need to have their ballots counted.鈥�
Jacqueline De Le贸n, staff attorney, NARF: 鈥淣ative American voters living on reservations in Montana are tired of being under-served and systemically discriminated against by the state. Today鈥檚 decision removes one unnecessary obstacle for rural Montana voters and helps every voice be heard in our state and federal elections. It is one step forward in the fight to protect our vote and our voices.鈥�
Marci McLean, executive director, Western Native Voice: 鈥淭his ruling means that Indigenous voters living on rural reservations are better able to participate in our democracy. Ensuring that all voters have access to the polls is a foundational component to our democracy, and we are pleased that our organizers can continue their get-out-the-vote and ballot collection efforts on every reservation in Montana. The excellent result in this lawsuit shows what can happen when organizations, individuals, organizers and tribal governments come together.鈥�
This ruling follows a preliminary injunction granted by the court in July, which temporarily blocked the law.
The lawsuit was filed in the Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court in Yellowstone County.
Ruling: /legal-document/order-western-native-voice-v-stapleton-decision
Case details: /cases/western-native-voice-v-stapleton
