Federal Appeals Court Rejects Arizona鈥檚 Request to Rehear Driver鈥檚 License Case
Decision paves the way for young immigrants to apply for driver鈥檚 licenses
November 24, 2014
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org
SAN FRANCISCO 鈥 Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected a request to reconsider its earlier ruling that Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer鈥檚 denial of driver鈥檚 licenses to certain young immigrants is unconstitutional. The move validates a decision issued in July ordering the state to stop depriving those young immigrants who came to this country as children from obtaining a driver鈥檚 license. The group of young people鈥攚ho have permission from the federal government to live and work in the U.S.鈥攁re seriously impaired by their inability to get drivers鈥 licenses, the court said earlier this year.
Today鈥檚 ruling is the latest legal victory in a civil rights coalition鈥檚 lawsuit against a discriminatory policy that prevented Arizona youth granted work authorization through the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program from applying for state-issued identification.
The news was welcomed by plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including Arizona DREAM Act Coalition President Dulce Matuz, who said, 鈥淕overnor Brewer has wasted countless taxpayer dollars defending a misguided and harmful policy that has been rejected time and time again by the courts. We hope today鈥檚 announcement allows us to finally apply for the identification document that rightly identifies us as Arizonans.鈥
鈥淭he Ninth Circuit, district court, and federal government all agree: Arizona鈥檚 denial of driver鈥檚 licenses to hardworking young immigrants violates our Constitution,鈥 said Jennifer Chang Newell, staff attorney with the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 Immigrants鈥 Rights Project. 鈥淚t is long past time for Governor Brewer to read the writing on the wall and let the DREAMers drive!鈥
For more than two years, the plaintiffs in this case have fought for the right to earn driver鈥檚 licenses.
In August of 2012, Brewer issued an order specifically denying licenses to young immigrants who are granted permission to live and work in the U.S. under the DACA program. The National Immigration Law Center, the 老澳门开奖结果, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), and the 老澳门开奖结果 of Arizona challenged the executive order and related policies in court, alleging that the ban violates DACA recipients鈥 constitutional right to equal protection under the law as well as the principles of federal supremacy in the area of immigration policy and law.
鈥淲ith today鈥檚 decision, the court has made crystal clear that Arizona鈥檚 quixotic quest to turn immigrants into villains is constitutionally unsound, and it vindicates our courageous plaintiffs,鈥 said Marielena Hincapi茅, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center.
鈥淭his should serve as a wakeup call for the new governor: Do what鈥檚 best for your state by allowing everyone who should be able to get a license to do so, so they can drive to school and work and participate fully in their communities.鈥
MALDEF National Senior Counsel, Victor Viramontes, said: 鈥淎rizona鈥檚 anti-immigrant campaign is a destructive policy that has proven to be very costly for tax payers. Now, Arizona has lost yet again in federal court, and DACA recipients will finally receive the licenses that Arizona should never have denied them.鈥
After a federal district court held, in May 2013, that Arizona鈥檚 policy likely constituted unconstitutional discrimination, the state sought to expand its denial of licenses to additional categories of immigrants, unsuccessfully seeking to avoid the appearance of discrimination.
In July 2014, the Ninth Circuit determined that Brewer鈥檚 policy was likely to be found unconstitutional and approved a preliminary injunction to allow immigrant youth to apply for licenses. This injunction was placed on hold after Arizona requested rehearing en banc, which would have provided the state an opportunity to make their arguments in front of an 11-judge panel.
Before denying Arizona鈥檚 rehearing request, the court had invited the United States to share its views on whether the case should be reheard. In September, the United States filed a brief with the court agreeing that Arizona鈥檚 policy is unconstitutional and opposing its rehearing request.
A copy of the court鈥檚 order is available here.
For more information about the lawsuit challenging the policy in Arizona denying driver鈥檚 licenses to DREAMers, click here.