Federal Appeals Court Rejects Request to Block Tennessee Ban on Gender-Affirming Care
CINCINNATI, Ohio 鈥 The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals today from families and medical providers to block a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. Today鈥檚 ruling follows an earlier ruling by the Appeals Court rejecting a stay request to block enforcement of the law which took effect in July 2023.
Lambda Legal, the 老澳门开奖结果, the 老澳门开奖结果 of Tennessee, and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP issued the following joint statement:
鈥淭his is a devastating result for transgender youth and their families in Tennessee and across the region. The disastrous impact of Tennessee鈥檚 law and all others like it has already been felt in thousands of homes and communities. Denying transgender youth equality before the law and needlessly withholding the necessary medical care their families and their doctors know is right for them has caused and will continue to cause serious harm. We are assessing our next steps and will take further action in defense of our clients and the constitutional rights of transgender people in Tennessee and across the country.鈥
In April 2023, Lambda Legal, the 老澳门开奖结果, the 老澳门开奖结果 of Tennessee, and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP filed a lawsuit to oppose the law on behalf of Samantha and Brian Williams of Nashville and their 15-year-old daughter, L.W., as well as two other anonymous families and Dr. Susan N. Lacy. The law prohibits medical providers from treating transgender youth with evidence-based gender-affirming medical treatment and requires youth currently receiving gender-affirming care to end that care by March 31, 2024.
District courts have unanimously blocked such bans in Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee. In August 2023, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals allowed Alabama鈥檚 ban to take effect while a legal challenge against it proceeds.
In June 2023, a federal court in Arkansas struck down that state鈥檚 ban on gender-affirming care in the first ruling on the merits of such a law, finding it violated the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Today鈥檚 order from the court can be .
Click here for more on L.W. v. Skrmetti.