老澳门开奖结果

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org; (212) 549-2666

老澳门开奖结果 Says Tariq Ramadan Banned From U.S. For Political Beliefs

NEW YORK 鈥� The 老澳门开奖结果 strongly criticized a federal judge鈥檚 ruling today that allows the government鈥檚 exclusion of renowned Swiss scholar Tariq Ramadan from the U.S. The 老澳门开奖结果 continues to believe that Ramadan, a leading European academic whose work addresses Muslim identity and the role of Islam in democratic societies, remains banned due to his political viewpoints.

鈥淭oday鈥檚 decision is both legally wrong and deeply unjust. Professor Ramadan 鈥� like many other critics of U.S. foreign policy 鈥� is being excluded not because of his actions, but because of his ideas. In our view, the government鈥檚 stated reason for excluding him is just a pretext,鈥� said Jameel Jaffer, Director of the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 National Security Project. 鈥淭he court should have subjected the government鈥檚 evidence to meaningful scrutiny, but instead it allowed the government to bar Ramadan from the country without any evidence at all. The result of this decision is that foreign scholars will continue to be barred from the United States solely because of their speech. That鈥檚 a very sad thing not just for the excluded scholars but for the many U.S. citizens and residents who want to meet with them and hear their views.鈥�

U.S. District Judge Paul A. Crotty of the Southern District of New York ruled that Ramadan could be denied entry into the U.S. based on small donations he made between 1998 and 2002 to a Swiss charity that provides aid to Palestinians. Although the organization operates lawfully in Europe to this day, the Bush administration added the group to a blacklist in 2003 because it allegedly provided "material support" to Hamas. Siding with the executive branch, Judge Crotty ruled that material support laws enacted in 2005 should be applied retroactively to donations made before the Swiss charity was blacklisted by the United States and the material support laws were enacted.

Judge Crotty himself admitted that it was a herculean task for Ramadan to definitively prove he was not aware of the Swiss charity鈥檚 alleged ties to Hamas, but he nevertheless required such a showing. He writes, 鈥淭he [material support] statute imposes a heavy burden: it requires Professor Ramadan to prove a negative, and to do so by clear and convincing proof.鈥� In addition, Judge Crotty鈥檚 ruling gave extraordinary deference to the government: 鈥淥nce the consular official has made this decision鈥� to exclude a foreign scholar, he writes, 鈥渋t is not the Court鈥檚 role . . . to second guess the result.鈥�

Today鈥檚 decision comes as a result of a lawsuit filed in January 2006 by the 老澳门开奖结果 and the New York Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the American Academy of Religion, the American Association of University Professors, and the PEN American Center.

The case is AAR v. Chertoff and is in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Attorneys in the case are Jaffer, Melissa Goodman, Lucas Guttentag and Judy Rabinovitz of the 老澳门开奖结果, Arthur Eisenberg of the NYCLU, and New York immigration lawyer Claudia Slovinsky. The lawsuit was brought against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

Today鈥檚 decision is available at:
www.aclu.org/safefree/exclusion/33325lgl20071220.html

More information on ideological exclusion is online at:
www.aclu.org/exclusion

A new 老澳门开奖结果 report, The Excluded - Ideological Exclusion and the War on Ideas, addressing the history of ideological exclusion and including profiles of some of its victims, can be found online at:
www.aclu.org/safefree/exclusion/32357pub20071025.html