ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û

ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û Intends to Appeal Decision Allowing Telephone Tracking

December 27, 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org

NEW YORK – A federal court issued an opinion and order in ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û v. Clapper, the ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û’s challenge to the constitutionality of the NSA’s mass call-tracking program, ruling that the government’s bulk collection of phone records is lawful under Section 215 of the Patriot Act and under the Fourth Amendment. The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction and granted the government’s motion to dismiss the case. Judge Pauley’s ruling conflicts with last week’s ruling by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that the mass call-tracking program violates the Fourth Amendment. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û plans to appeal the ruling to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit on June 11, 2013, less than a week after the mass call-tracking program was revealed by The Guardian newspaper based on documents obtained from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

"We are extremely disappointed with this decision, which misinterprets the relevant statutes, understates the privacy implications of the government’s surveillance and misapplies a narrow and outdated precedent to read away core constitutional protections," said Jameel Jaffer, ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û deputy legal director. "As another federal judge and the president’s own review group concluded last week, the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of telephony data constitutes a serious invasion of Americans’ privacy. We intend to appeal and look forward to making our case in the Second Circuit."

The full ruling is available at:
aclu.org/national-security/aclu-v-clapper-order-granting-governments-motion-dismiss-and-denying-aclu-motion