Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Ending Benton County鈥檚 Modern-Day Debtors鈥� Prison
Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Ending Benton County鈥檚 Modern-Day Debtors鈥� Prison
The 老澳门开奖结果 and the law firm of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC today announced a settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Benton County in central Washington over its unconstitutional system for collecting court-imposed debts. The suit (Fuentes v. Benton County) ended the County鈥檚 practice of jailing, threatening to jail, or forcing manual labor on poor people unable to afford legal financial obligations (LFOs) imposed by the County.
鈥淲e are very pleased that Benton County has stopped operating a modern-day debtors鈥� prison. No one should have to go to jail or perform manual labor simply because they are too poor to pay their fines.鈥� said 老澳门开奖结果 of Washington staff attorney Prachi Dave.
鈥淭he County has finally ended its longstanding practice of punishing people for their poverty. Thousands of individuals no longer have to worry about being carted off to jail because of their financial circumstances,鈥� said attorney Toby Marshall of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC.
Legal financial obligations (commonly referred to as LFOs) are fines, fees, costs, and restitution that are imposed as part of a criminal sentence. Benton County routinely assessed these charges in amounts upwards of $1,000 without considering a person鈥檚 ability to pay. Indigent people who were unable to pay the LFOs were sentenced to incarceration in jail or to toil on a work crew. And the sentences were imposed at hearings that provided no meaningful opportunity for defendants to explain why they were unable to pay.
After the suit was filed, the Board of Benton County Commissioners repealed the resolution that had authorized jail or manual labor for failure to pay LFOs. And the County quashed existing warrants for failure to pay and released everyone being held in jail solely for failure to pay.
Under terms of the settlement announced today:
- The County will not issue warrants over noncompliance with LFO payments.
- Benton County District Court judges must inquire about a person鈥檚 ability to pay at any hearing over alleged non-payment of LFOs. Individuals will not be punished if it is determined that they lack the financial means to pay the LFOs.
- Individuals will be entitled to court hearings to seek reductions in the amount of their outstanding LFOs or a waiver of some or all of those LFOs.
- Any person facing a hearing over alleged non-payment of LFOs that could lead to incarceration will receive written notice at least 21 days before the hearing.
- Benton County public defenders and prosecutors will participate in training on laws and procedures for the constitutional assessment and collection of LFOs.
The suit was filed in October 2015 in Yakima County Superior Court on behalf of three indigent plaintiffs 鈥� Jayne Fuentes, Gina Taggart, and Reese Groves 鈥� who suffered serious hardships as a result of court-imposed debts that were imposed without a determination of their ability to pay. All three have been incarcerated or made to do manual labor because they could not afford the LFOs. And all three faced the constant fear that they could be jailed again in the future for their inability to pay.
The suit said that Benton County鈥檚 debtors鈥� prison system violated the U.S. and Washington State Constitutions, which prohibit incarcerating a person for non-payment of court-imposed fines, fees, and costs without a meaningful hearing and consideration of alternatives to incarceration. The landmark cases Bearden v. Georgia (U.S Supreme Court, 1983), State v. Blazina (Wash. Supreme Court, 2015) and Smith v. Whatcom County District Court (Wash. Court of Appeals, 2002) make clear that people may not be incarcerated for non-payment of court-imposed debts if their failure to pay is due to their poverty.
"Across the country, counties and cities seeking revenue are using jail and forced labor to coerce poor people to pay fines and fees they cannot afford. This settlement sends the message that those practices will not be tolerated and must come to an end," said Nusrat Choudhury, staff attorney with the 老澳门开奖结果's Racial Justice Program. "These reforms will help ensure that people's freedom no longer rests on their financial circumstances."
The 老澳门开奖结果 highlighted the problem of debtors鈥� prisons nationwide in a report issued in 2010, In for a Penny: The Rise of America鈥檚 New Debtors鈥� Prisons. Benton County鈥檚 LFO system was highlighted in Modern-Day Debtors鈥� Prisons: The Ways Court-Imposed Debts Punish People for Being Poor, a report published in 2014 by the 老澳门开奖结果 of Washington and Columbia Legal Services.
The plaintiffs are represented by 老澳门开奖结果 of Washington attorney Prachi Dave; Nusrat Choudhury and Dennis Parker of the 老澳门开奖结果, Racial Justice Program; and Toby Marshall and Elizabeth Adams of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC.
Racial Justice
Fuentes v. Benton County
Racial Justice
Fuentes v. Benton County
Learn More 老澳门开奖结果 the Issues in This Press Release
-
Press ReleaseDec 2024
Racial Justice
老澳门开奖结果 Statement on House AI Task Force Report老澳门开奖结果 Statement on House AI Task Force Report
WASHINGTON 鈥� Today, the House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence (AI) issued its final report, marking an important step in recognizing the serious risks of discrimination and bias posed by AI systems 鈥� particularly in law enforcement鈥檚 use of facial recognition technology. The report recognizes that discrimination and bias may arise in AI systems due to their design, training data, or failures by end users. The report also investigates the complex considerations around deepfakes, open AI systems, and free speech, and urges Congress to pass narrow legislation to address concrete harms. In response to the House AI Task Force final report, Cody Venzke, senior policy counsel at the 老澳门开奖结果, issued the following statement: 鈥淭he 老澳门开奖结果 commends the Task Force for recognizing that AI systems are harming people right now through discriminatory outcomes and supercharged surveillance. Curbing those abuses of AI is not a partisan issue, and more concrete action is needed to protect civil rights, while maintaining states鈥� authority to build on those protections. The Task Force is appropriately cautious when wrestling with issues around deepfakes, open-source AI, digital identity, and other issues, recognizing that legislators should consider a wide array of tailored tools to address real, not speculative, harms while respecting civil rights and civil liberties.鈥� The House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence report can be found here. -
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Racial Justice
Human Rights
Why the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights IssueWhy the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights Issue
On International Human Rights Day, the 老澳门开奖结果 is advocating for a long-sought after reparatory justice to end the continued abuses against Black and brown communities. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
National Security
+2 Issues
老澳门开奖结果 Warns that Biden-Harris Administration Rules on AI in National Security Lack Key Protections老澳门开奖结果 Warns that Biden-Harris Administration Rules on AI in National Security Lack Key Protections
WASHINGTON 鈥� The Biden-Harris administration today released its National Security Memorandum on Artificial Intelligence (AI), establishing guidelines for how the U.S. government uses AI in national security programs, such as counterterrorism, intelligence, homeland security, and defense. The use of AI to automate and expand national security activities poses some of the greatest dangers to people鈥檚 lives and civil liberties. Agencies are increasingly exploring the use of AI in decisions about who to surveil, who to stop and search at the airport, who to add to government watchlists, and even who is a military target. While the government鈥檚 policy includes some important steps forward 鈥� such as requiring national security agencies to better track and assess their AI systems for risks and prohibiting a subset of dangerous AI uses 鈥� it falls far short in other critical areas, leaving glaring gaps with respect to independent oversight, transparency, notice, and redress. The policy imposes few substantive safeguards on a wide range of AI-driven activities, by and large allowing agencies to decide for themselves how to mitigate the risks posed by national security systems that have immense consequences for people鈥檚 lives and rights. As we have repeatedly seen before, this is a recipe for dangerous technologies to proliferate in secret. 鈥淒espite acknowledging the considerable risks of AI, this policy does not go nearly far enough to protect us from dangerous and unaccountable AI systems. National security agencies must not be left to police themselves as they increasingly subject people in the United States to powerful new technologies,鈥� said Patrick Toomey, deputy director of 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 National Security Project. 鈥淚f developing national security AI systems is an urgent priority for the country, then adopting critical rights and privacy safeguards is just as urgent. Without transparency, independent oversight, and built-in mechanisms for individuals to obtain accountability when AI systems err or fail, the policy鈥檚 safeguards are inadequate and place our civil rights and civil liberties at risk.鈥� For years, the 老澳门开奖结果 has been urging far stronger safeguards and transparency about the AI tools that national security agencies are deploying, the rules constraining their use, and the dangers these systems pose to fairness, privacy, and due process. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
Racial Justice
老澳门开奖结果 Comment on the Department of Labor鈥檚 AI Guidelines for Employers and Vendors老澳门开奖结果 Comment on the Department of Labor鈥檚 AI Guidelines for Employers and Vendors
WASHINGTON 鈥� Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released a roadmap for artificial intelligence (AI) best practices, designed to ensure that emerging technologies such as AI enhance job quality, benefit workers, and comply with existing employment laws when they are used in the workplace. The best practices, pursuant to President Biden鈥檚 executive order on the development and use of AI, include recommendations for AI system developers and employers that prioritize workers鈥� experiences and empowerment throughout the entire AI lifecycle 鈥� from design to use and oversight. These practices also call on employers and developers to create standards and processes to identify and mitigate risks from AI systems, such as threats to health and safety, civil rights, privacy, fair labor rights, and labor organizing prior to a developer marketing them or an employer deploying them, and recommend turning to different systems when sufficient mitigation is not possible. 鈥淲e applaud DOL for issuing best practices for use of AI that center workers鈥� empowerment, civil rights, privacy, and safety protections and call on developers and employers to adopt critical guardrails in developing, procuring and using AI systems. Employers and developers should take note, as many have been burying their heads in the sand on their risk of legal liability with respect to AI tools,鈥� said Olga Akselrod, senior staff attorney of the 老澳门开奖结果 Racial Justice Program. 鈥淔ollowing these best practices for AI can help employers and developers ensure that they do not violate existing civil rights and other employment laws that protect workers.鈥� The best practices also recommend transparency measures through conducting and publishing impact assessments, notice and recourse for impacted workers, and measures to minimize worker displacement. The DOL also stated that employers should minimize electronic monitoring and avoid unnecessary collection or retention of worker data.