1.0老澳门开奖结果Urooba Abid/news/author/uabidrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="5tDrnajA0h"><a href="/cases/idaho-federation-of-teachers-v-labrador">Idaho Federation of Teachers v. Labrador</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="/cases/idaho-federation-of-teachers-v-labrador/embed#?secret=5tDrnajA0h" width="600" height="338" title="“Idaho Federation of Teachers v. Labrador” — 老澳门开奖结果" data-secret="5tDrnajA0h" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); /* ]]> */ </script> This lawsuit challenged an Idaho statute that purports to criminalize the use of any public funds to “promote abortion” or “counsel in favor of abortion.” We argued that the law violates the First Amendment by restricting academic speech about abortion by faculty at Idaho’s public universities, and that the law is unconstitutionally vague.