Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de Blasio
What's at Stake
The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, together with the New York Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), and LatinoJustice PRLDEF, has filed a motion to intervene in the federal lawsuit Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de Blasio.
Summary
The McAuliffe lawsuit centers on New York City Department of Education efforts to address the marked racial and geographic segregation in New York’s elite specialized high schools.
We are seeking to join the case on behalf of students and community groups to defend the modest steps taken by New York City to increase access for disadvantaged students to the most competitive and highly-regarded public high schools, and redress the systemic racial exclusion caused by the deeply flawed, test-only admissions policy. We represent Teens Take Charge – a public-school student led organization, the Hispanic Federation, Desis Rising Up & Moving (DRUM), the Coalition for Asian American Children and Families (CACF), and multiple Black and Latinx public school students and their families.
Access to the specialized high schools has for decades been limited by the need to compete on the basis of a single test. Students with greater racial, social, and economic privilege are far more likely to access these elite, though public, schools. For example, Black and Latinx students received only 190 of the 4,324 offers of admission to the eight Specialized High Schools for the coming school year. Moreover, while most public schools send no students to the Specialized High Schools, 50 percent of all offers go to students from fewer than 30 of the approximately 600 middle schools.
These figures include students admitted through a second tier of admissions, known as the Discovery Program. Through the Discovery Program, students who score just below the standardized test cut off and come from low-income households can also gain admission after taking a summer preparation session. To increase access to the schools, New York City added a measure to this method of admissions, taking into account whether the student attends a middle school with high economic need, in addition to their own family income status
The McAuliffe suit is brought by opponents of school desegregation, who wish to challenge these new policies aimed at increasing opportunity and equitable access to these schools. The ÀÏ°ÄÃÅ¿ª½±½á¹û, our co-counsel, and our clients are seeking to join the suit to defend these small efforts, which we believe are only a first step in providing equal educational opportunities for students in New York City.
Legal Documents
-
05/03/2019
Motion to Intervene as Defendants - PTO v De Blasio -
-
05/03/2019
O.R. Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Showa Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Rosa Velasquez Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Tiffany Bond Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Lauren Mahoney Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
B.M. (Teens Take Charge Declaration) - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Nayim Islam (Desis Rising Up and Moving) Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Jose Calderon Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Anita Gundanna (Coalition for Asian American Children and Families) Declaration - PTO v. De Blasio -
05/03/2019
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene - PTO v De Blasio
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsO.R. Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsShowa Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsRosa Velasquez Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsTiffany Bond Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsLauren Mahoney Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsB.M. (Teens Take Charge Declaration) - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsNayim Islam (Desis Rising Up and Moving) Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsJose Calderon Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsAnita Gundanna (Coalition for Asian American Children and Families) Declaration - PTO v. De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School PTO v. Bill de BlasioLegal DocumentsMemorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene - PTO v De BlasioDate Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
-
05/03/2019
-
03/24/2020
Opinion and Order granting Intervenors-Defendants' Motion to Intervene -
10/01/2021
City-Defendants' Notice of Summary Judgment -
10/01/2021
City-Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment -
11/19/2021
Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to City-Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment -
12/17/2021
City-Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgement -
09/07/2022
USDC Opinion and Order granting City-Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment -
10/12/2022
Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal -
09/24/2024
USCA Opinion and Order vacating USDC's Grant of Summary Judgment, remanding the Case to the USDC
Date Filed: 05/03/2019
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 03/24/2020
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 10/01/2021
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 10/01/2021
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 11/19/2021
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 12/17/2021
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 09/07/2022
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 10/12/2022
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 09/24/2024
Court: District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
Affiliate: New York
-
01/19/2023
Plaintiffs-Appellants' Opening Brief -
04/14/2023
Defendants-Appellees' Reply Brief -
05/05/2023
Plaintiffs-Appellants' Reply Brief -
09/24/2024
Opinion vacating USDC's Grant of Summary Judgment, remanding the Case to the USDC
Date Filed: 01/19/2023
Court: Appeals Court (2d Cir.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 04/14/2023
Court: Appeals Court (2d Cir.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 05/05/2023
Court: Appeals Court (2d Cir.)
Affiliate: New York
Date Filed: 09/24/2024
Court: Appeals Court (2d Cir.)
Affiliate: New York