Davidson v. City of Cranston
What's at Stake
Cranston, Rhode Island residents joined the 老澳门开奖结果 of Rhode Island to sue the City of Cranston, charging that the 2012 redistricting plan for the City Council and School Committee violates the one person, one vote principle of the U.S. Constitution by counting incarcerated people in their prison location as if they were all residents of Cranston.
Summary
Because those incarcerated were counted as Cranston residents, three voters in the prison's district have as much voting power as four voters in every other city district, according to Census Bureau data. Cranston residents Karen Davidson, Debbie Flitman, Eugene Perry, and Sylvia Weber have joined the 老澳门开奖结果 of Rhode Island as plaintiffs in the case. They are represented in federal court by Demos, the Prison Policy Initiative, and the 老澳门开奖结果.
The 2012 redistricting plan counted the population of Rhode Island's only state prison complex, the Adult Correctional Institutions, as residents of Ward 6 even though the overwhelming majority of these individuals are not true residents of the district, but instead remain residents of their pre-incarceration community for virtually all legal purposes, including voting.
According to Census Bureau data, without the incarcerated population, Ward 6 has only 10,209 true constituents. Yet those constituents now wield the same political power as the roughly 13,300 constituents in each of the other wards. This dilutes the voting strength and political influence of citizens residing outside of Ward 6, in clear violation of the Equal Protection requirements of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Update: On May 24th, 2016 the District Court granted our motion for summary judgment and ordered the Cranston City Council to propose a districting plan that complies with the constitutional and legal principles outlined above. No elections to the City Council or Board of Canvassers may be held until the current ward districting plan is changed.
Legal Documents
-
09/21/2016
Davidson v. City of Cranston - Opinion
Date Filed: 09/21/2016
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
05/24/2016
Davidson v. City of Cranston - Opinion
Date Filed: 05/24/2016
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
05/24/2016
Davidson v. Cranston - Memorandum and Order
Date Filed: 05/24/2016
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
10/31/2015
Davidson v. City of Cranston-Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
Date Filed: 10/31/2015
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
10/31/2015
Davidson v. City of Cranston-Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and Request for Oral Argument
Date Filed: 10/31/2015
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
10/09/2015
Davidson v. City of Cranston-Defendants鈥 Brief in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment
Date Filed: 10/09/2015
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
09/18/2015
Davidson v. City of Cranston-Plaintiffs' reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
Date Filed: 09/18/2015
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
08/06/2015
Davidson v. City of Cranston-Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants鈥 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintifs' Cross-motion for Summary Judgment
Date Filed: 08/06/2015
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
09/08/2014
Davidson v. City of Cranston - Order
Date Filed: 09/08/2014
Affiliate: Rhode Island
-
02/19/2014
Davidson v. City of Cranston - Complaint
Date Filed: 02/19/2014
Affiliate: Rhode Island
Press Releases
Federal Judge Orders End to 鈥淧rison Gerrymandering鈥 In Cranston School and City Council Districts
Residents and Advocates Sue City of Cranston over Redistricting Plan that Counts Incarcerated Population as Residents