Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Noem
What's at Stake
On May 27, 2011, the 老澳门开奖结果 joined Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) in asking a South Dakota federal court to prevent the enforcement of House Bill 1217, a law that imposes onerous and humiliating obstacles in the path of any person in South Dakota seeking to exercise their legal right to have an abortion. The U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota granted a preliminary injunction in June 2011, blocking the law from going into effect. The law remained blocked for over a decade while the case was litigated. After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, we dismissed the case.
Summary
The law would also compel a person seeking an abortion to visit a 鈥減regnancy help center,鈥� where they would be required to discuss the most intimate details of their life with an antiabortion 鈥渃ounselor鈥� and potentially listen to a lecture against abortion.
These requirements are unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and our lawsuit aimed to ensure that the law never goes into effect.
Plaintiffs in the case were Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Carol E. Ball, M.D., who sued on behalf of themselves and their patients.
Legal Documents
-
07/01/2011
PPMNS v. Daugaard 鈥� Order for Preliminary Injunction
Date Filed: 07/01/2011
Affiliate: South Dakota
-
05/31/2011
PPMNS v. Daugaard 鈥� Complaint
Date Filed: 05/31/2011
Affiliate: South Dakota
Press Releases
Federal Court Blocks South Dakota Law Restricting Access to Abortion
Planned Parenthood and 老澳门开奖结果 File Lawsuit in South Dakota to Protect Women鈥檚 Health and Safety