Disability Rights
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
Disability Rights
Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Deborah Laufer
Whether a 鈥渢ester鈥� has standing to challenge a place of public accommodation鈥檚 illegal failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she does not intend to visit that place of public accommodation.
Georgia
Jun 2020
Disability Rights
Harris v. Georgia Department of Corrections
On October 3, 2018, the 老澳门开奖结果 and the 老澳门开奖结果 of Georgia, together with National Association of the Deaf and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of deaf and hard of hearing people incarcerated in prisons supervised by the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC). The complaint highlights GDC鈥檚 failure to provide incarcerated deaf and hard of hearing people with equally effective communication access to programs, services, and activities, including medical care, telecommunications, and prison programs. Further, due to lack of access to interpreters and other communication accommodations, deaf prisoners are also often unable to explain or defend themselves when GDC takes disciplinary action against them.
Court Case
Jun 2020
Disability Rights
Cobb v. Georgia Department of Community Supervision
The 老澳门开奖结果 and 老澳门开奖结果 of Georgia, along with the National Association of the Deaf and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of deaf and hard of hearing individuals on probation and parole supervised by the Georgia Department of Community Supervision (GDCS). We also sought a preliminary injunction, directing GDCS to immediately provide American Sign Language interpreters, auxiliary aids and services, and reasonable modifications to deaf and hard of hearing individuals on probation or parole.
Court Case
Aug 2015
Disability Rights
Racial Justice
S.R. v. Kenton County Sheriff's Office
A deputy sheriff shackled two elementary school children who have disabilities, causing them pain and trauma, according to a federal lawsuit filed today by the 老澳门开奖结果, the Children's Law Center, and Dinsmore & Shohl.
All Cases
22 Disability Rights Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Disability Rights
Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski
The 老澳门开奖结果 filed an amicus brief in Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski to urge the Supreme Court to uphold private individuals鈥� right to sue state and local actors for violations of their federal civil rights under Section 1983.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Disability Rights
Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski
The 老澳门开奖结果 filed an amicus brief in Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski to urge the Supreme Court to uphold private individuals鈥� right to sue state and local actors for violations of their federal civil rights under Section 1983.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
Disability Rights
+2 Issues
Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C.
Whether civil rights statutes that prohibit federal financial recipients from discriminating on the basis of disability, race, and sex allow plaintiffs to be compensated for emotional distress injuries where they show that they were victims of discrimination.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
Disability Rights
+2 Issues
Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C.
Whether civil rights statutes that prohibit federal financial recipients from discriminating on the basis of disability, race, and sex allow plaintiffs to be compensated for emotional distress injuries where they show that they were victims of discrimination.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Disability Rights
California v. Texas
Whether Congress鈥檚 zeroing out of the tax assessment in the Affordable Care Act for people who fail to obtain health insurance renders the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional?
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Disability Rights
California v. Texas
Whether Congress鈥檚 zeroing out of the tax assessment in the Affordable Care Act for people who fail to obtain health insurance renders the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional?
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021
Disability Rights
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Doe
Whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act creates a private cause of action for disparate impact claims.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021
Disability Rights
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Doe
Whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act creates a private cause of action for disparate impact claims.
Court Case
Aug 2021
Disability Rights
+2 Issues
J.W. v. Paley
It is critical that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals clarify that the Fourth Amendment applies to the use of force against schoolchildren. J.W. v. Paley involves Fourteenth and Fourth Amendment claims stemming from a police officer tasing a high school student with disabilities who was attempting to exit the school building to calm down following an incident with another student. The district court dismissed the Fourteenth Amendment claim based on precedent, but allowed the Fourth Amendment claim to proceed, denying qualified immunity to the officer. The Fifth Circuit, however, reversed the lower court鈥檚 decision regarding the Fourth Amendment claim, ultimately leaving schoolchildren without any constitutional protection from excessive force by law enforcement in the Fifth Circuit.
Explore case
Court Case
Aug 2021
Disability Rights
+2 Issues
J.W. v. Paley
It is critical that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals clarify that the Fourth Amendment applies to the use of force against schoolchildren. J.W. v. Paley involves Fourteenth and Fourth Amendment claims stemming from a police officer tasing a high school student with disabilities who was attempting to exit the school building to calm down following an incident with another student. The district court dismissed the Fourteenth Amendment claim based on precedent, but allowed the Fourth Amendment claim to proceed, denying qualified immunity to the officer. The Fifth Circuit, however, reversed the lower court鈥檚 decision regarding the Fourth Amendment claim, ultimately leaving schoolchildren without any constitutional protection from excessive force by law enforcement in the Fifth Circuit.