Back to News & Commentary

Supreme Court: No Life Sentences for Juveniles Who Haven't Killed

Share This Page
May 17, 2010

the Supreme Court in a 6-3 vote that children may not be given a life sentence if they haven't killed anyone. The court's ruling says the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, requires that juveniles serving life sentences must at least be considered for release. In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, "The state has denied [Terrance Graham] any chance to later demonstrate that he is fit to rejoin society based solely on a nonhomicide crime that he committed while he was a child in the eyes of the law鈥his the Eighth Amendment does not permit." In its opinion, the court also discussed the relevance of international law and practice, noting the "global consensus" against life sentences for juveniles who haven't committed murder, and that "the United States stands alone in a world that has turned its face against life without parole for juvenile nonhomicide offenders."

Every year in the U.S., children as young as 13 are sentenced to spend the rest of their lives in prison without any opportunity for release. Today, are sentenced to life without parole. have been sentenced to life for a crime less serious than killing. Shockingly, there is no other country in the world that sentences juveniles to life without parole.

The Supreme Court's historic decision recognizes that it is cruel to pass a final judgment on adolescents, who have an enormous capacity for change and rehabilitation compared to adults. We commend the court's decision, and are hopeful that today's ruling will start a national conversation about how we sentence young people, most of whom have no opportunity to escape the negative environments that contribute to crime.

Learn more about the effort to prohibit juvenile life sentences without parole on the 老澳门开奖结果's site and over at .

Learn More 老澳门开奖结果 the Issues on This Page