Back to News & Commentary

Supreme Court Says Cops and Courts Must Consider Child鈥檚 Age in Miranda Warnings

Aziz Ahmad,
Racial Justice Program
Julian Letton,
Racial Justice Program
Share This Page
June 17, 2011

Yesterday the Supreme Court rejected North Carolina鈥檚 effort to deprive a 13-year-old student his Miranda rights. In a 5-4 decision, the that police and courts must consider a child鈥檚 age when determining whether that child should be read Miranda rights. The 老澳门开奖结果 filed an amicus brief in the case.

A quick primer on Miranda: Criminal suspects are entitled to Miranda warnings 鈥 the ones we all learned from Law & Order 鈥 when they are being interrogated in custody. And a suspect is in custody when a reasonable person would think he or she is not free to end the questioning and leave.

J.D.B., a seventh grader, was removed from his classroom by uniformed police and taken to a closed-door conference room where police and school administrators questioned him for 30 minutes about burglaries in the neighborhood. They did not give him Miranda warnings or the opportunity to call his grandmother, nor did they tell him he was free to leave the room, until after he'd confessed. Instead they threatened him with jail and recorded his confession. When his public defender later tried to get the confession thrown out because J.D.B. wasn't given a Miranda warning, the North Carolina Supreme Court held that the child was never actually in custody, and that his youth was not relevant to his reasonable belief otherwise.

The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide whether age was in fact something to consider when deciding if a person was in custody. To the 老澳门开奖结果 and five Supreme Court Justices, the answer was painfully obvious 鈥 yes, of course.

As the Court explained, 鈥淸i]t is beyond dispute that children will often feel bound to submit to police questioning when an adult in the same circumstances would feel free to leave,鈥 and there is no reason for 鈥減olice officers or courts to blind themselves to that commonsense reality.鈥 The Court supported its decision by citing Roper v. Simmons (which ended the death penalty for crimes committed by juveniles) and Graham v. Florida (which ended life without parole for non-homicide juvenile offenders).

We should celebrate this important victory. However, our amicus brief, , made a second important commonsense point that we ought to consider: the often coercive school environment should also be a factor weighed by cops and courts in giving Miranda rights. At school, students are not free to disobey orders nor are they free to leave without consequence. And the stakes are high: common misbehavior that once merited a trip to the principal鈥檚 office is now routinely referred to outside law enforcement.

What鈥檚 more, police are increasingly present as a permanent fixture in schools nationwide. New York City, for example, has over 5000 police officers placed inside its schools. The NYPD School Safety Division constitutes the fifth largest police force in the country, with more officers than the police departments in Washington D.C., Detroit, Baltimore, Dallas, Boston or Las Vegas.

The result of all these cops in schools? Arrest for harmless, noncriminal behavior. You might get be arrested for , or , and if you are a , you鈥檒l be facing handcuffs at the very least. If you push a hall monitor, well that鈥檚 鈥渁ssault on a public servant鈥 and you might just get a . Schools have become a distressingly common pipeline to jail.

Students of color are at a greater risk of arrest at school than their white peers. For example, a review of school police practices in West Hartford, Connecticut, revealed that black and Latino students account for 24 percent of the town鈥檚 student body, but make up 63 percent of school-based arrests. It鈥檚 clearly more than outliers and anecdotes: 老澳门开奖结果 reports document systemic issues resulting in the in NYC. And arrest rates track the large racial disparity in school discipline and 鈥榸ero tolerance鈥 policies: the NYCLU recently published a study focusing on .

The Supreme Court took a step in the right direction yesterday by recognizing that age must be a factor in determining whether students are entitled to basic constitutional protections. But when are being arrested for temper tantrums, we need to ask some important questions about the role of police in schools. Until we address those questions, the destructive effects of the school-to-prison-pipeline will continue to be felt by all students and particularly children of color.

Learn more about the school-to-prison pipeline: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .

Learn More 老澳门开奖结果 the Issues on This Page