老澳门开奖结果

DENVER 鈥� The Colorado Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments today in a discrimination case brought by a same-sex couple against a cake shop that refused to sell them a cake for their wedding reception.

In 2012, Colorado residents David Mullins and Charlie Craig visited Masterpiece Cakeshop to order a wedding cake. Mullins and Craig planned to marry in Massachusetts and then celebrate with family and friends back home. Masterpiece owner Jack Phillips informed the couple that, because of his religious beliefs, it was his standard business practice to refuse to provide cakes to customers for same-sex weddings. Phillips has turned away several other couples for the same reason.

鈥淎s marriage equality becomes law all across the nation, it鈥檚 especially disheartening that we鈥檙e still fighting this battle where businesseslike Masterpiece Cakeshop feel they can violate the law and discriminate against us just because of who we are and who we love,鈥� said Mullins. His partner Craig added, 鈥淚t鈥檚 time we moved on from using religion as an excuse to discriminate. No one should be told they are less than anyone else, especially at a joyous time like a wedding.鈥�

Colorado鈥檚 Anti-Discrimination Act prohibits businesses, such as Masterpiece Cakeshop, from refusing service based on factors including race, sex, national origin, or sexual orientation. The 老澳门开奖结果 and the 老澳门开奖结果 of Colorado filed suit on behalf of Mullins and Craig in 2013.. In December 2013, an administrative judge ruled that the bakery had illegally discriminated against the couple. In 2014, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission affirmed that ruling. Masterpiece Cakeshop appealed.

鈥淣obody gets to pick and choose which laws they want to follow,鈥� said 老澳门开奖结果 of Colorado Legal Director Mark Silverstein. 鈥淚f a business owner is allowed to simply cite personal beliefs as a basis for turning away same-sex couples, then what stops a doctor from denying medical care or a pharmacist from denying a prescription?鈥�

When businesses and other institutions that serve the public have sought exemptions to laws barring discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, the courts have held that businesses are required to comply with LGBT discrimination laws. The courts have ruled without regard to whether LGBT people could have obtained the good or service elsewhere. Instead the courts have recognized the harm to the notion of equal opportunity if LGBT people can be turned away from businesses otherwise open to the public because of who they are.

鈥淭his case has never been about cakes. Let me be clear: This is about sending a message that open for business in America means open to all,鈥� said 老澳门开奖结果 Deputy Director Louise Melling. 鈥淲e strongly believe that freedom of religion is our constitutional right and we will continue to defend it, but religion should not be used as an excuse to discriminate. That鈥檚 why we鈥檙e fighting for Dave and Charlie and others who are victims of discrimination in the name of religion.鈥�

For more information about Charlie Craig and David Mullins v. Masterpiece Cakeshop: /cases/charlie-craig-and-david-mullins-v-masterpiece-cakeshop?redirect=lgbt-rights/charlie-craig-and-david-mullins-v-masterpiece-cakeshop