Supreme Court Rules it is Against the Law to Fire LGBTQ People
WASHINGTON 鈥 The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled in a trio of cases that it is against the law to fire people for being LGBTQ. The 老澳门开奖结果 was counsel in the cases of Aimee Stephens and Don Zarda and argued Ms. Stephens鈥 case.
James Esseks, director of the 老澳门开奖结果鈥檚 LGBTQ & HIV Project had the following response:
鈥淭his is a huge victory for LGBTQ equality. Over 50 years ago, Black and Brown trans women, drag queens, and butch lesbians fought back against police brutality and discrimination that too many LGBTQ people still face. The Supreme Court鈥檚 clarification that it鈥檚 unlawful to fire people because they鈥檙e LGBTQ is the result of decades of advocates fighting for our rights. The court has caught up to the majority of our country, which already knows that discriminating against LGBTQ people is both unfair and against the law. We celebrate the LGBTQ people, including our clients Aimee Stephens and Don Zarda, as well as Donna Stephens, Aimee鈥檚 wife, and Bill Moore and Melissa Zarda, Don鈥檚 former partner and sister, who moved these cases forward after they died.
鈥淥ur work is not done. There are still alarming gaps in federal civil rights laws that leave people 鈥 particularly Black and Brown LGBTQ people 鈥 open to discrimination in businesses open to the public and taxpayer-funded programs. Congress must affirm today鈥檚 decision and update our laws to ensure comprehensive and explicit protections for LGBTQ people and all people who face discrimination.鈥
Donna Stephens, Aimee Stephens鈥 wife of 20 years, issued this statement:
鈥淢y wife Aimee was my soulmate. We were married for 20 years. For the last seven years of Aimee鈥檚 life, she rose as a leader who fought against discrimination against transgender people, starting when she was fired for coming out as a woman, despite her recent promotion at the time. I am grateful for this victory to honor the legacy of Aimee, and to ensure people are treated fairly regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.鈥
Aimee Stephens, before her death, shared the following when discussing a possible ruling in her favor:
鈥淔iring me because I鈥檓 transgender was discrimination, plain and simple, and I am glad the Court recognized that what happened to me is wrong and illegal. I am thankful that the Court said my transgender siblings and I have a place in our laws 鈥 it made me feel safer and more included in society.鈥
Melissa Zarda had the following response:
鈥淢y brother Don was my rock, my everything. I stood in the Supreme Court to honor his memory and to continue the fight for fairness. What happened to Don was wrong. People in our country already knew this, and now there is no question.鈥
The Supreme Court鈥檚 ruling is here: /legal-document/bostock-v-clayton-county-supreme-court-opinion