Supreme Court Upholds Basic Principles of Nondiscrimination, Reverses Colorado Civil Rights Commission Decision
WASHINGTON 鈥 The Supreme Court today reaffirmed the core principle that businesses open to the public must be open to all in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The court did not accept arguments that would have turned back the clock on equality by making our basic civil rights protections unenforceable, but reversed this case based on concerns specific to the facts here. The 老澳门开奖结果 argued the case on behalf of Charlie Craig and David Mullins, who were refused service at a Colorado bakery because they are a same-sex couple.
In 2012, Mullins and Craig visited the Masterpiece Cakeshop to order a cake for their wedding. After the bakery turned the would-be customers away because they were a same-sex couple, Mullins and Craig filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The commission found that the bakery had discriminated against the couple in violation of Colorado law, a decision the Colorado courts upheld. The Supreme Court today found that members of the commission had made statements evidencing anti-religious bias, and thus had not given a fair consideration to the bakery鈥檚 claims.
鈥淭he court reversed the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision based on concerns unique to the case but reaffirmed its longstanding rule that states can prevent the harms of discrimination in the marketplace, including against LGBT people,鈥 said Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the 老澳门开奖结果.
鈥淭oday鈥檚 decision means our fight against discrimination and unfair treatment will continue,鈥 said Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins, client in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case. 鈥淲e have always believed that in America, you should not be turned away from a business open to the public because of who you are. We brought this case because no one should have to face the shame, embarrassment, and humiliation of being told 鈥榳e don鈥檛 serve your kind here鈥 that we faced, and we will continue fighting until no one does.鈥
More information on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission can be found here:
/cases/masterpiece-cakeshop-v-colorado-civil-rights-commission