FOIA

FOIA Request for Justice Department Policy Memos on GPS Location Tracking

Status: Ongoing
Last Update: March 12, 2014

What's at Stake

The 老澳门开奖结果 filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Department of Justice in July 2012 seeking the release of two memos providing guidance to federal prosecutors and investigators for using GPS devices and other location tracking technologies. The memos were written in response to the Supreme Court鈥檚 landmark decision on location tracking, U.S. v. Jones. The 老澳门开奖结果 filed a lawsuit to enforce the request in August 2012, and in January 2013, the government handed over the memos 鈥 but they were almost entirely redacted. Oral argument in the case is scheduled for August 15 in New York.

In January 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that the government鈥檚 attachment of a GPS tracker to a car constitutes a 鈥渟earch鈥 under the Fourth Amendment. The existence of the memos the 老澳门开奖结果 is seeking was revealed when the FBI鈥檚 general counsel discussed them at a law school talk that was . You can see our original FOIA request here and the redacted copies the government turned over here and here.

With technological innovation making it easier than ever for the government to track our movements, it is crucial that we know how law enforcement employs new technologies against ordinary citizens. The Justice Department claims that it should not have to turn over the memos because they are attorney work-product. While we agree that executive branch lawyers should be able to freely discuss legal theories, once those opinions become official government policy the public has an absolute right to know what they are. Otherwise, the government is operating under secret law that makes accountability to the people impossible.

The 老澳门开奖结果 will continue to fight for the release of the memos to ensure that the government respects Americans鈥 privacy rights and the Constitution鈥檚 protection against unreasonable searches.

Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts

Learn More 老澳门开奖结果 the Issues in This Case